Re: Spring 2016 | Page 56

Are Civil Partnerships Discriminative? You may have seen in the news the story of Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, a heterosexual couple from London, who had launched court proceedings to challenge the limitations of the current procedure for civil partnerships which are only open to homosexual couples. The couple have previously given interviews, explaining their reasons for wishing to enter into a civil partnership, rather than to marry. Both have spoken of their wish to legally formalise their relationship which they felt was representative of a true partnership, and that on a more equal basis, this would be best as a civil partnership. One further point raised was that the civil partnership process involves the noting of both of the couples’ parents’ identities, and occupations. The traditional and potentially outdated marriage process involves only noting the father of each of the bride and groom. Perhaps the Government may consider extending civil partnerships to heterosexual couples, if they are persuaded that there is demand for this 56 Mrs Justice Andrews has refused the couple’s application for a Judicial Review suggesting that the law is discriminating against them, and almost immediately the couple have confirmed their intention to appeal. The civil partnership process has been considered by many a stop-gap which was devised and offered during the time until marriage between homosexual couples was made legal in 2014. Now, homosexual couples have the option to choose between formalising their relationship legally in a civil partnership, or in marriage. Heterosexual couples do not however. A civil partnership does have all of the same legal effects as marriage. The Government have also commented that they are considering the future of civil partnerships. Particularly, it is going to be important to note whether there is a decline in the number of couples choosing to enter into civil partnerships following the introduction of gay marriage. If there is, and if this trend continues, then the Government may decide to abolish civil partnership altogether. The case of Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan is attracting a great deal of attention however. Their petition at present has signatures exceeding 36,000 and their Gofundme donations are a whopping £27,000. There is clearly support for the case that they are bringing. Perhaps the Government may consider extending civil partnerships to heterosexual couples, if they are persuaded that there is demand for this. The effects of civil partnership and marriage remain the same however, and there are many rights and obligations which are acquired by spouses and civil partners, regardless of their method of formalising the relationship between them. By Laura Sherlock