PwC's Managing upstream risk: Regulatory reform review - An asian perspective December 2013 | Page 26

2.15 EMIR Derivatives traded on EU trading venues are covered by reporting rules under both EMIR and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID). MiFID covers the actual trading of derivatives, whereas EMIR is about post-trading arrangements. ESMA’s Q&As are aimed at clarifying counterparties’ reporting requirements and at fostering consistency by avoiding reporting conflicts between the two regimes. According to the legal definitions included in EMIR, any EU counterparty which has concluded a derivative contract is covered by EMIR’s reporting obligation. At the same time, conclusion of derivative contracts should be understood as execution of a transaction under MiFID. Accordingly, the following counterparties will have to report their ETD trades to TRs: Update IOSCO on 20 December 2013 published a letter from Commissioner Michel Barnier in reply to its own repeated requests for clarification on the status of Asian-Pacific CCP’s under EMIR. Highlights of Barnier’s responses are as follows: • The letter opens with the caveat that although Mr Barnier is trying to provide clarity, the European Court of Justice is the final arbiter of EU legislation; • The Commission has received technical advice from ESMA with respect to the legal\ supervisory arrangements in the relevant countries. Where significant disparities with EMIR are found, the Commission will engage in dialogue to explore alternative means of resolution; • Central Clearinghouses (CCPs) clearing the trades; • ESMA will shortly submit draft memoranda of understanding to the countries for their review • Clearing members of the CCP clearing the trades; • The Commission is aware that CCP’s in third-country jurisdictions are providing services to EU banks that are subject to the CRR, and that this will induce these CCP’s to seek with ESMA. Accordingly, the Commission will undertake equivalence assessments “in the very near future” to facilitate recognition of these CCP’s; and • The Commission will consider extending the time-period for these assessments in line with Article 497 CRR. On the same day, ESMA clarifies reporting of on-exchange derivatives under EMIR by issuing an updated Q&A. From 12 February 2014, EMIR requires all EU counterparties to a derivative contract to report their trades to a TR, irrespective of whether these are traded on or off exchange. Reporting derivative contracts enables regulators to identify and analyse potential risks associated with derivative markets. 26 Regulatory Reform Review | Banking • MiFID investment firms executing derivative trades on a trading venue of which it is a member; and • Counterparties to derivative contracts that do not fall into any of the categories above, except when they are exempt because of their status. Any of these participants are obliged to report all derivative contracts that they have concluded with any of the other participants. Clearing members and their clients need to report separately, whereas firms who are not a counterparty to a derivative contract do not have to report their trades.