Popular Culture Review Vol. 27, No. 1, Winter 2016 | Page 8

iPad, iPod, and tablet images, is there any reprieve from the ubiquity of these signs that have been carefully packaged for our consumption? Reminding the somewhat naïve staffer that the hegemonic tool of proliferation has been used against the public many times in the past, Brean elucidates that our defenses are weak because they are constantly being overloaded by more information that we can efficiently process. In the pervasive realm of simulation that surrounds us from all sides, our capacity for critical reflection is greatly diminished. For this reason, no one questions the validity of  the  signs  that  we  receive  in  ‘real-time.’ Nonetheless, Brean realizes that his fake Albanian war, like all other creative fictions transmitted through hyper-real mediums, hinges upon “the  constant  flow  of  war  coverage”  (Walton 17). The complete artifice of their fictitious conflict will never be exposed as long as its iconic images are continually transmitted everywhere through all possible channels. Yet, Brean is also cognizant that this orchestrated campaign of misinformation can never be silenced or fail to saturate misguided patriotic citizens in their homes, workplaces, or shopping centers. As Baudrillard underscores in The Transparency of Evil,  “for  it  to  be  ‘good’   communication it must take place fast-there is no time for silence. Silence is banished from our screens; it has no place in communication. Media  images  […]  never  fall  silent:   images and messages must follow  one  upon  the  other  without  interruption”  (14). In Wag the Dog, every metonymical sign mirrors a larger image of a country whose alleged duty it is to defend freedom and human dignity both domestically and abroad. In other words, this endless barrage of misinformation is part of a larger narrative with which the American public identifies. Elucidating that semiotic proliferation always follows a script, 7