Popular Culture Review Vol. 27, No. 1, Winter 2016 | Page 25

Additionally, since we can no longer discriminate between cinematic images and the real thing due to recent technological advances that deceive our senses, Brean and Motss’s  fictitious  conflict  will  not  be  the  first  or  last  time  that war follows a carefully orchestrated script. As Baudrillard highlights in The Intelligence of Evil in the context of the Gulf War, [w]hat we are watching as we sit paralysed in our fold-down  seats  isn’t   ‘like a  film’;;  it  is a film. With a script, a screenplay, that has to be followed unswervingly. The casting and the technical and financial resources have all been meticulously scheduled: these are professionals at work. Including control of the distribution channels. In the end, operational war becomes an enormous special effect; cinema becomes the paradigm of warfare, and  we  imagine  it  as  ’real’,  whereas  it  is  merely  the  mirror of its cinematic being (124) Asserting that cinematic hyper-reality has totally engulfed the real, Baudrillard leaves  the  reader  with  the  following  conclusion:  “It’s  the  same  with  the  cinema:  the films produced today are merely the visible allegory of the cinematic form that has taken over everything-social  and  political  life,  the  landscape,  war,  etc.”  (The Intelligence of Evil 125). Like reality and morality, the writing of history is now part of the larger framework of the omnipresent universe of simulation. For Baudrillard, not only are we doomed to experience non-events that transpire on a quotidian basis, but we also incessantly relive them in our collective imagination generations later when nothing else remains besides a contrived image. Similar to the protagonist Brean in Wag the Dog, Baudrillard realizes 24