Popular Culture Review Vol. 26, No. 2, Summer 2015 | Page 32

Josh Bates & Kristin M. Barton Each of the artists represented above share a mix of rock, pop, and electronic content; whereas popular artists pre-2001 were independently adding variety to the charts, not sharing fashionable music-trends. While a keen listener may be able to distinguish subtle nuances between these songs that could promote genre disparity and arguably provide the artists with faint shades of variety (such as Macklemore’s hip hop tonality, Pink’s pop sensibility, and Imagine Dragons’ rock overtures), all of the artists in RS’s June, 2013, top 5 list share similarly catchy hooks (memorable melodies) and pulsing, dancelike rhythms, derived from the electronically generated beats and synthesized chord progressions. To say that a parallel activity exists between the industry’s homogenous musical output beginning in 2001 and American Idol is not to imply that there were no homogenous songs before the show; it is to indicate that this lack of disparity has been perpetuated by the talent-based competition and has decreased America’s overall desire for creative and fresh music. Music is a compelling medium that is crucial to the lives of listeners (Levitin); it is an artistic expression unlike any other in its ability to combine auditory, visual, and memory-based activity. A song can please the listener as it travels from the ears through the brain’s membranes, causing the individual to recall vivid images, and heighten one’s mood. The medium is invaluable, and it is important that research is performed to preserve its integrity. Future studies in this area may be able to expose more expansive results of the homogenous of pitch content and decibel levels (similar to the research conducted by Serrà et al.) within contemporary songs, a further decrease in musical diversity may be revealed. 29