Popular Culture Review Vol. 26, No. 1, Winter 2015 | Page 70

Postmodern Pastiche: Following the Path of Productive Parody on Sesame Street Critics of postmodernism may dismiss the theory as an overarching discourse serving as a showcase in the demise of high art, the inability to achieve truth, the death of the grand narrative, or the emptiness of parody. While I do not wish to engage in a discussion regarding the facets of postmodern theory itself, I will focus on addressing the issue of pastiche and parody specifically, as well as their context. This article seeks to explore parody that serves a purpose, which I refer to as productive parody, and in order to accomplish this I chose Sesame Street as the primary basis for my analysis. While Sesame Street functions overall as postmodern pastiche, there are certain segments of the show that serve implicitly as parody. Firstly, I will provide an overview of postmodern pastiche and how Sesame Street fits into that description, and secondly I will analyze specific segments of the show, both vintage and contemporary episodes, in order to illustrate how they function as a form of productive parody. Additionally, by analyzing contextual shifts within the educational platform of a televisual pastiche, we may be better able to assess exactly how productive parody functions, as well as its implications. Pastiche and Parody There are multiple ways that we can define parody and pastiche; therefore, I would like to begin by exploring the tension between the definitions that have been established by postmodern scholars thus far. Fredric Jameson has referred to pastiche, in the postmodern age, as an empty and meaningless replacement to parody without the presence of a “healthy linguistic normality” (17). Thus, parody no longer exists in postmodern culture precisely because we are unable to create new meaning, as language and subject have become both fragmented and schizoid (Powell 39). Since Jameson argues that we must have linguistic normality (i.e., modern language) in order to create parody, he provides us with a gloomy prospectus of our inability to derive new meaning from established works (at least in parodic form), while simultaneously indicating we no longer have a formal and healthy language structure. Linda Hutcheon, on the other hand, provides us with a distinctly different perspective of postmodern pastiche and parody. She refers to “postmodern parody” specifically, generally objecting to the notion that parody and pastiche are one in the same or that parody has been 66