Popular Culture Review Vol. 24, No. 1, Winter 2013 | Page 42

38 Populär Culture Review 16- Söllers was the chief editor of the avant-garde joumal Tel Quel—since then re-baptized L Tnfini—in the pages of which Derrida published some of his early work. 17- The critical trajectory of a fervent proponent of radical reader’s response theory such as Stanley Fish is highly representative of the general disorientation of our field when it comes to the definition of both our corpus of study and our occupation: after claiming that literature is solely created by the reader (Is There a Text in the Class?), Fish tumed his attention towards a classic TV series (The Fugitive in Flight), most likely in order to capitalize upon recent, authoritative scholarly interest in populär culture, and is of late admonishing the profession for neglecting the study of literature to promote political agendas (Save the World on Your Own Time); in other words, after denying the possible intrinsic existence of literary texts and tuming the English department at Duke university into a post-structuralist, ideologically oriented theoretical powerhouse, Fish criticizes his peers for no longer studying literature, having shown the way by taking on a classic TV series: in the true spirit of reader’s response theory, Fish is creating the discipline and the corpus of study as he goes. 18- “All art is quite useless.” The Picture ofDorian Gray, 4. 19- As pointed out by Brice Parain as early as 1942, no language besides that of mathematics can be deemed to function in a strictly monosemic manner; all human exchanges are constantly subject to semiotic variations which may ränge from slight semantic ambiguity to total misunderstanding. 20- These two categories, i.e., narrative and poetic, often intersect and so, poetry can be narrative and narrative prose poetized; French romantic poet Lamartine’s long narration in verse Jocelyn and any of Victor Hugo’s novels, for instance, present very comparable levels of semiotic violence and, given that the somewhat grandiloquent tone of Lamartine has not aged well, one could argue than Hugo’s prose remains more poetic today than Lamartine’s poetry. Baudelaire’s prose poems or Lautreamont’s Les Chants de Maldoror are convincing illustrations of a perfect balance between poetic semiotic violence and narrative construction; although both are generally deemed to be poetry, the former could also be considered as highly poetized short stories and the latter as a semiotically ultra-violent novel. In the same fashion, although from the other side of the spectrum, novels such James Joyce’s Finnegan’s Wake or Luis Martin Santos’ Time o f Silence could be as well described as poetic, or at least linguistically defamiliarizing, for both exhibit, each in its own way, strong semiotic violence. We find equivalent values in the cinematographic language, and we can oppose for instance Terry Gillian or Tim Burton’s “poetic” conception of cinematography to a more prosaic, down-to-earth type of cinema, exemplified by the action and adventure genre. 21- Recent developments in quantum physics and String theory seem to point towards the existence of a physical multiverse, i.e., a set of parallel worlds or dimensions; however, benefiting from the mistakes of my elders, I will not venture to establish any relationship between my theory of narrative worlds and