Popular Culture Review Vol. 23, No. 2, Summer 2012 | Page 41

Philosophical Reflections on the Age of Ephemera 37 12 See Neil Postman, “Critical Thinking in the Electronic A ge,” Selected Issues in Logic and Communication, Trudy Govier, ed. (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1988): 11-18. 13 See Neil Postman, “The N ew s,” Conscientious Objections (New York: Knopf, 1988). Here Postman points out that a television news discussion o f the federal budget is inevitably accompanied— and, indeed, must be accompanied— by a scene o f large machines churning out huge reams o f dollar bills. The visual medium demands motion. 14 Ibid., 81. 15 See, for instance, Kiku Adatto, Sound Bite Democracy: Network Evening News Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1968-1988 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990). Adatto is especially keen to point out how little interest there is in the text o f a campaign. The average “sound bite”— a “bloc o f uninterrupted speech”— lasted 42.3 seconds in 1968. This is an eternity for television— try it with a stopwatch— and it shows the clumsiness o f early TV production. By 1988 the average sound bite lasted only 9.8 seconds. 16 Cf. Gleick’s expansive overview o f the development o f the idea o f information in James Gleick, The Information: A History, A Theory, A Flood (NY: Pantheon Books, 2011): 4. 17 Ibid., 217. See also Claude Elwood Shannon, “Communication Theory o f Secrecy Systems,” Collected Papers (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1993): 85. 18 Gleick, 417. 19 See “Neil Young: Steve Jobs Listened to Vinyl, Piracy is the New Radio,” accessed 5/11/12. Neil Young, a product o f an analog age, has expressed surprise that audiences have been willing to trade accessibility for fidelity in music. See, for example, “Neil Young: Steve Jobs and I Were Working on the N ew iPod,” accessed 5/11/12. 20 For an overview o f psychological research on the subject, see Jon L. Peirce, Tatiana Kostova, and Kurt T. Dirks, “The State o f Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century o f Research,” Review o f General Psychology (v. 7, n. 1) March 2003: 84-107; or Lita Furby, “Understanding the Psychology o f Possession and Ownership: A Personal Memoir and Appraisal o f Our Progress,” Journal o f Social Behavior and Personality (v. 6, n. 6) 1991: 457-463. 21 My thanks to Hanne Jacobs for providing me with a copy o f her article “Towards a Phenomenological Account o f Personal Identity,” Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences: Essays in Commemoration o f Edmond Husserl Carlo Iema, Hanne Jacobs, and Filip Mattens, eds. (New York: Springer, 2010): 333-363. In a similar vein, Sartre would say that we engage in— or are defined by— “projects,” about which he says: Now the meaning o f the past is strictly dependent on my present project. This certainly does not mean that I can make the meaning o f my previous acts vary in any way I please; quite the contrary, it means the fundamental project wh ich 1 am decides absolutely the meaning which the past which I have to be can have for me and for others. Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness (New York: Gramercy Books, 1956): 498 [emphasis mine]. 22 Jacobs, 348. 23 Ibid., 350.