Popular Culture Review Vol. 23, No. 1, Winter 2012 | Page 38

34 Popular Culture Review Where the Heart Is: The Achievement of Granada Television’s Sherlock Holmes Films,” and Fred and Wendy Erisman, in their article, “‘Data! Data! Data!’ Holmesian Echoes in Star Trek: The Next Generation,^" are among the many who have asserted that even more central to the canon than the mysteries, is the near-mythic friendship between Watson and Holmes. While this is certainly true, it raises interesting implications for the argument of Moriarty as Holmes’ double. At that rate—shouldn’t the professor have a friend as well? While being on a first name basis alone fails to confirm friendship, it does constitute a start, especially when you pause to consider how few arch-villains are on such terms with their henchmen. Moreover, despite its many supposed failings, the film does an astounding job of capturing the compassion that Moriarty’s second has for him. So, while this certainly isn’t the archetypal Holmes-Watson relationship, it does convey a level of intimacy we’re not typically used to seeing displayed toward our arch-nemeses. Attractive, even young—despite the post-Reichenbach timeline—the film’s Moriarty uniquely reconstitutes traits other on-screen Moriartys have had. Power-hungry, with aspirations of world-domination far exceeding the run of London’s underworld, unlike most Moriartys, whose actions and attitudes are often foreshadowed by their appearances, this man remains attractive despite being manipulative and unabashedly evil. In this way, the film’s depiction of Moriarty perhaps most realistically embodies the “banality of evil,” perhaps explaining why he is one of the only representations of the character to be killed by something so mundane as a bullet. Unlike his unrecognizable cinematic counterpart, Moore’s Moriarty dies much more fantastically, by falling into the sky. As Goldman asserts, “Moriarty is so loath to descend to the level of the crowds that he grasps the cavorite [anti gravity material] and flies upwards and out of this installment of the story” (148). While Goldman’s point emphasizes Moriarty’s desire to stand out as an individual, even at the cost of his own life—after the fashion of classic mythological over-reachers such as Icarus and Phaeton—his argument overlooks the fact that Moriarty overreaches merely in an attempt to save his precious anti gravity material; unwilling to give up his designs, James clings to the Wellsian cavorite with the same sort of psychotic frenzy with which he attacks Holmes at Reichenbach. Sacrificing himself upon the altar of his ambition, rather than that of his vanity, Moriarty stands out not only from the crowd below, but also from the typical arch-villain. Imagery of the literal fall is also attributed to Disney’s Professor Ratigan, in their feature-length animated film The Great Mouse Detective, which features characters based on those found in the children’s book series Basil o f Baker Street. An obvious homage to Professor Moriarty, Ratigan is voiced by Vincent Price in what has been famously attributed as having been his favorite role. Virtually no scholarship exists on the film, which is too bad because it is ripe with Sherlockian allusion, as well as an original mystery set in the Holmes style and, indeed, taking place beneath his very nose.