Popular Culture Review Vol. 22, No. 2, Summer 2011 | Page 49

Y Si, Yo Creo 45 death. Thoughts of quests to find the World Tree or the fountain of youth have given way to hopes that medical science might one day allow for humans to live greatly longer lives. Tommy represents this modem day conception of immortality. He is a skilled surgeon and medical researcher whose consistent mantra through the first part of the film is that “death is a disease.” This attitude reflects Tommy’s unwillingness to face the death of his beloved wife and his own. This becomes more evident later in the film, where Tommy has prolonged his own life by eating the flesh of the tree as the pair travel to Xibalba. Aronofsky invites his viewers to challenge their own level of acceptance of their mortality by reminding them that preoccupation with death has existed in mythic and symbolic form as a companion to human culture. In an interview with Michelle Fetters, Aronofsky addresses this last point, arguing, “We’ve become so preoccupied [as a society] with sustaining the physical that we often forget to nurture or take care of the spirit. That’s one of the central themes I wanted to tackle within the film: Does death make us human, and if we could live forever, would we lose our humanity in the doing so?” (www.movieffeak.com). This is the journey that will be undertaken by Tommy in the film. He has sacrificed everything—even time with his dying wife—to feed his belief that he can conquer death. In so doing, he risks losing his humanity. In addition to utilizing the motif of the World tree, Aronofsky also uses elements of the Mayan underworld, most specifically with regards to Xibalba. Izzi describes Xibalba to Tommy as “a nebula wrapped around a dying star.” This image categorizes the relationship between Tommy and Izzi, first through his attempts to hold her to the physical world and then in their shared death. In the original Mayan, Xibalba roughly translates into “place of fear,” however, the movie makes it clear that the guardian is Tommy/Tomas’s own fear of death, and not a guardian intending to block the path to all, just to the unworthy or those who are unprepared. Similarly, Buddha comes to enlightenment beneath the Bodhi tree while being besieged and tempted by the demon Mara. Trevor Ling says of Mara, “Against those who are Enlightened, he is totally powerless, and all his attempts are folly. It is he who has been defeated when a disciple continues in meditation, or becomes fully enlightened” (urbandharma.org). In these examples, a guardian or barrier to knowledge exists, but only in relation to the worthiness and readiness of the person pursuing it. Both of these accounts are the complete opposite from the Book of Genesis, and the type of scenario repudiated by the film: the cherubim with the flaming sword permanently guards the gateway to the Tree of Life—there is no way past it. Of this image of the guarded Tree of Life, E.O. James asserts, “Therefore, the Tree of Life was guarded by a cherubim to prevent Adam putting forth his hand to secure immortal life by partaking of its fruit. If this interpretation is correct, in the earlier myth the tree had always been taboo, and it was not until divine knowledge had been acquired by partaking of the Tree of Knowledge in the midst of the garden, that he thereby obtained understanding of the mysteries of sex, childbirth, life and death. This made mankind procreative and raised it to a