Popular Culture Review Vol. 22, No. 1, Winter 2011 | Page 79

Sports Talk Radio 75 listener invests time by listening; further investment (i.e., listening more consistently) gains access to inside narratives and a deeper understanding of the show. Of course those who regularly call make the most investment, in terms of preparing for their call, waiting to be placed on the air, and risking that they might be “run” and their material will be scorned. The callers also see the effect of honor and humiliation on community members as there is much honor in being identified as a call worthy to be “racked” and perhaps singled out for the “huge call of the day,” or inclusion in the annual “smack-off” By bestowing these types of recognition, norms are continually affirmed for all listeners to observe. Finally, the extent to which there exists a spiritual bond is somewhat difficult to ascertain and describe, but most ardent sports fans would acknowledge some intangible connection to their favorite sport or athlete. It is not difficult to see how this bonding might also be applied to a radio show that has a loyal and devoted audience as Rome’s does. The mythological language, the intimacy between callers, and the attachment to these characters by the listening audience all attend to this sense of a unique connection. Implications and Conclusions Sports talk radio clearly has the potential to create community, perhaps even to forge new ways of uniting individuals across geographic and other divisions. The ability to create community through The Jim Rome Show, argued here using the McMillan and Chavis (2006) model of community, emphasized how a shared culture uses group norms and shared language to develop community. These arguments support how sports talk radio maintains radio’s place as a relevant part of current popular culture. Although this paper focuses on the community-building aspects of this radio show, it is important to note the limitations and problematic aspects of The Jim Rome Show community as well. There has been critique of the racist elements, particularly around Chicano(a)s/Latino(a)s (Mariscal, 1999), and the uneven treatment that female athletes and gender issues receive (Nylund, 2007; Reffue, 2006). Nylund (2001, 2007) has demonstrated how sports talk radio shows, with Th e Jim Rome Show as a particular example, are successful in reinforcing the “homosocial” environment of sports in which a predominantly male or male-centric world predominates. These critiques are certainly consistent with critiques of sport and society as a whole, yet another reminder of how popular culture reveals and perhaps influences social values. However, despite these limitations, the ability of sports talk radio to connect a diverse community of individuals has tremendous possibilities. The accessibility of the format makes for an extremely broad membership potential, and when coupled with skillful application of group dynamics, this genre allows members to have a strong sense of influence, inclusion, and connectedness. The culture of sports talk radio can provide a unique opportunity to expand upon conversations about sports to broader historical, social, and political themes, thereby sparking awareness and connecting individuals to perspectives and