Popular Culture Review Vol. 21, No. 2, Summer 2010 | Page 83

Dancing in the Theaters of Seventeenth Century Spain 79 delinquents that is almost unintelligible to the modem Spanish reader. In the dances, all characters are also very funny, something that in the long comedies is reserved for the servants. Unlike what can be found in the dances, in the long comedies only the servants tell jokes, make jokes, or suffer the jokes of others. Another way the characters reflected their social status in the long plays that disappears in the dances was through their different desires and expectations. These desires and expectations were class-coded in the long plays, but not in the dances. The long plays presented status divisions as natural, therefore it was logical that members of different groups felt and wanted different things in different ways. Nobility (except villains) experienced ideal and platonic love and disregarded material wealth, while servants were mainly concerned with sex, food, alcohol, and money. The higher classes had high pursuits and wanted to nourish their minds and hearts; the lower classes wanted to indulge their bodies. In the three dances by Moreto, the noble characters care mainly about their corporeal needs. A good example of this can be found in the Dance o f Lucretia and Tarquin. When Lucretia is about to die after having stabbed herself, a woman offers to call a friar (for confession, we might assume), but Lucretia tell her: “No, amigas, hacedme un baile / como es costumbre en las fiestas” (“No, my friends, dance for me, / as it is habitual in the celebrations”) (367). Thus Lucretia renounces salvation in order to have fun during the last moments of her life; her priorities are the ones typical of a servant in a long play, not of a noblewoman. It is precisely the impropriety of these reactions that make the audience laugh. One needs to be familiar with the expectations of the long plays in order to find the actions of the characters in the dance funny. The staging of the dances was also conceived as a caricature of the conventions of the staging of the long dramas. Even though it is very difficult for the modem scholar to imagine how the actors acted and declaimed, we know that the techniques used in the short pieces were more exaggerated than the ones used in the long plays. Something similar happens with the dress codes. By no means could one say that the costumes and decorations used in the dramas were realistic. Anachronisms both in the staging and in the plays themselves were very common. When, for example, an actress came on stage representing the Queen Isabel la Catolica, her attire probably had no resemblance to anything the Queen would have ever worn, but it reflected what was considered suitable clothing for a queen. Spanish actors wore regular clothes (in a very broad sense of the term), not deliberate costumes as they did in other theatrical traditions like Commedia dell’Arte. Clothing was nevertheless conventionally coded, certain pieces had certain meanings, and the audience was able to decipher the code. For example, when a man was carrying a torch the public understood it was night time, when someone was wearing a cape it meant they were on a trip, and so on. In the dances, the actors used real costumes, that is, clothing that was deliberately unrealistic and that portrayed them as carnival figures and jesters. The clothing in itself was intended to be comical and ridiculous. In this manner, the dances and other short pieces distance themselves from the main plays