Popular Culture Review Vol. 20, No. 2, Summer 2009 | Page 41

The Simplification of NFL Team Logos 37 gave teams (Turner’s Atlanta Braves and the Tribune's Chicago Cubs) national exposure. Baseball executives, fearing the erosion of their fan base at the hands of the Superstations, have tried to halt their growth for years. Superstations and national television contracts in major sports franchises have done significant damage to the sports logo as a sign of allegiance. And every new logo and uniform change means a new line of collectible items. Instead of showing loyalty to a team by supporting the players, fans show loyalty by buying the latest shirts and hats. Tony Spaeth (1993), an image design consultant for corporations and the advertising industry, noted the trend toward simplification of logos in corporate America during the 1990s; as logos emphasized more than brand identity alone, it became imperative that they also conveyed a corporate identity. Researchers discovered that consumers responded to companies that not only conveyed a sense of sound management, but also made this image clear in their identity. Brilliantly executed re-branding, according to Spaeth (2005), can revive, refresh, and renew corporate spirits, as well as those, presumably, of professional sports franchises. Although the consuming public may assume that they are the priority audience for logo changes, often the employees of the franchise are at least as important if not more so. Two themes are particularly clear in today’s identity changes. One is focus, either narrower or simply clearer and a more openly expressed focus. A second trend is change for the sake of change, to shake up things, usually among employees (1994). Perhaps a logo, then, is best understood as the manifestation of a leader’s vision. Methodology The aesthetic characteristics of sports logos examined in this study include the elements of color, line, shape, direction, simplicity, complexity, and symbolic aspects with attention to changes in design over time. The study used Chris Creamer’s Sportslogos website (http://www.sportslogos.net/). Creamer, himself a logo enthusiast and designer for the Toronto Maple Leafs hockey team, relies on sports fans who are interested in logos to contribute to the site and maintain its integrity. From Creamer’s website, 12 National Football League (NFL) teams and their logos were selected for analysis: New York Giants, Chicago Bears, Pittsburgh Steelers, Green Bay Packers, Washington Redskins, Arizona Cardinals, Cleveland Browns, Philadelphia Eagles, Indianapolis Colts, San Francisco 49ers, St. Louis Rams, and Detroit Lions.1 These teams were chosen because they existed before the television broadcasts of the 1960s and still exist today. In this way, we could track changes in each team’s logo design, while making inferences based on the historical events in question. In addition to examining the aesthetics of the logos, we sought expert analysis from representatives of the teams. Of all the teams we tried contacting, the Chicago Bears were the only organization to reply. George H. McCaskey, senior director of ticket operations for the team and “unofficial team historian,” is compiling a history of the Bears’ uniform. His mother, Virginia Halas