Popular Culture Review Vol. 18, No. 1, Winter 2007 | Page 74

70 Popular Culture Review stepped on a land mine. He became blind as a result of the accident. Rather than be a burden on his family, Sot Chit decided to live by himself. His friends built a hut for him behind some shops. Gittoes says that Som Chit would like to learn Braille; however, the nearest Braille learning centre is in Bangkok. In reflecting upon Som Chit, Gittoes says: “As I stepped away from this little hut I realised how far the dark tentacles of Pol Pot’s year zero insanities had reached. 1 looked back at Som Chit suspended above the dark pond water, the BLIND FIELD.”'’' Concluding Remarks While Gittoes’ ‘Minefields’ series is intended to disturb, it also reaffirms the global nature of land mines as a form of bio-power. What emerges from these images is a concern for responding to corporeal violation. Each image is a social commentary which ties individual to nation. As the body is both a biological and social product, it is tied to the land and to the nation. It is on this point that Ignatieff asks us whether a nation can make its citizens ill, and is a nation’s psyche tied to the psyche of its citizens.^" Foucault suggested that “technologies in the domination of self’ are techniques which not only attempt to inform the conduct of people, but also shapes relations between self and others and between self and land (nation).'^^ A significant feature of Gittoe’s art points at modem technology’s ability to fragment self For Afghanistan and Cambodia, landmines epitomise the excesses of modem regimes and their capacity to emasculate self and land. Christian University of Thailand Arthur Saniotis Notes ' I express my gratitude to Mr. George Gittoes for giving me permission to use his works from his 'Minefields’ exhibition for this article. ‘ Athena Athanasiou, Technologies of Hu X[