Popular Culture Review Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2001 | Page 33

Writing Women’s Magazines 29 and it looked boring and I know they were slavishly following their focus groups (Editor, interviewed May 1997). This statement indicates the tensions that reader input produces. Should the magazine follow it or not? Do readers really know what they want and do all readers want the same thing? Readers’ desires, dislikes, true life stories, letters and so on have to be assessed for suitability and whether they fit the magazine’s ‘house style’. As each magazine has tried to create its own identity in a crowded market, the danger of following readers too closely is that the identity may be lost. Weeklies have a wide readership range, which the deputy features editor suggested was almost like having two separate audiences - younger women and those aged mid thirties and above. The magazine differentiates its audience by age, yet all women are seen as sharing factors which can override this division and other divisions (for example class, ethnicity, race, sexuality) and which enables them to read and enjoy the same weekly magazine (although readers would not necessarily see all aspects of the content as appropriate to themselves, for example make-up tips demonstrated on white models were seen as irrelevant by black readers; fashion for thin women was regarded as unsuitable by average or larger sized readers). To relate this point back to the earlier discussion about the notion of ‘woman’ in women’s magazines, appealing to a mass market audience encourages the magazine to propose interests that are im plied and endorsed by the editor and Journalists as constant in every woman’s life - her appearance, home, and family. By using these themes, the magazine hopes to reach all women, regardless of age, class, sexuality or race and therefore this is how the magazine constructs femininity in its pages. Challenges to this femininity or to the unique selling point of the magazine are rejected by the editor. For example, the advertising manager of the magazine wanted to take an advertisement by Ann Summers, the lingerie and sex aids company. The editor was unhappy about this because the kind of femininity the magazine offers to its readers is not sexy - it is home and family oriented. Despite evidence that the most popular magazine among women who held Ann Summers parties was this particular weekly, the editor felt that readers would be offended by such an advertisement and it was in fact rejected. In turn, the advertisers can be offended by what they see as inappropriate headlines: Sometimes advertisers ask us why we don’t have all practical headlines and the advantage of the headline is to catch someone’s eye and quite honestly it’s not a Which? guide to anything, it’s for entertainment as well as thought provoking as well as practical as well as information giving. So occasionally they’ll question a headline but it does catch the