September/October 2018 | Page 9

G ove r n men t Re lat ions PDA Action Alert: Assignment of Benefits Moving Through the House Contact your Representative IMMEDIATELY to Request Support for SB 373, printer’s number 1287 Good News: SB 373 passed out of the House Insurance Committee in June. Bad News: The Committee amended SB 373, essentially changing the legislation to require dual signature, and prohibiting dentists from balance billing when they do accept the assigned benefit directly. It also extends the effective date from 60 to 240 days. PDA does not support this amendment. Our message now is clear: Ask your Representative to support SB 373 with prior printer’s number 1287. This is the version that p assed the Senate before it was amended. We want the House to pass the same bill that passed the Senate. Your participation in this process is essential to moving SB 373 through the House of Representatives and on to Governor Wolf for his signature. Please contact your Representative and request his or her support for SB 373, printer number 1287. It will only take a few minutes of your time to make a big investment in your practice. Ask your family, friends, office staff and colleagues to also contact their Representative. We provide talking points and a sample letter. Contact PDA at [email protected] or (800) 223-0016 for the sample letter. PDA is optimistic that the House of Representatives will pass SB 373 before the end of session this fall. But we need a united front to counter the insurance lobbyists hard at work opposing this bill. Legislators will count how many dentists contact them about SB 373 when deciding how to vote. They will assume this legislation is not important to dentists if they don’t hear from you. Find your representative’s contact information here: www.legis.state.pa.us. TALKING POINTS: • The House Insurance Committee’s amendment further complicates an already complicated billing process. Requiring dual signature is a burden to patients who must sign the check and mail or drop the check off at the dental office. Assigning the benefit directly is much easier for patients. • Most dentists are small business owners with significant overhead costs and employees to pay. Prohibiting them from balancing billing in certain situations is a financial burden that could impact the solvency of their practice, hindering patients’ ability to access care. • Some patients cannot see their dentist of choice because some insurance companies do not directly pay the non- participating provider, and the patient cannot afford to pay for services upfront. Dentists who do not require advanced payment may never be paid for services rendered. This insurance practice unfairly inhibits patients from seeking care from their dentist of choice, even though they are paying for a benefit that should be able to be applied to any provider, regardless of whether or not the provider participates with the insurance plan. The insurance is a purchased product and belongs to the patient. • Absence of assignment of benefits legislation forces patients to pay upfront for treatment they may not be able to afford. This can be particularly difficult for divorced or separated parents, single parents and low-income families. It would be much easier for patients to have the ability to assign their dental benefit directly to the provider. • Parents who are divorced or separated may experience the problem where one parent has custody of a child, while the other parent carries the insurance. The latter may never send the insurance check to the custodial parent, who had to pay for services upfront. Faced with this situation, many custodial parent postpone or avoid care altogether. This could also impact the dentist, who sympathizes with the parent and sees the child without requiring advanced payment. Often, these dentists are never paid. • Patients residing in rural areas are placed at a disadvantage as there may only be a handful of dentists who are in-network. Patients may have to incur more traveling time and expense to seek treatment from an in-network provider, rather than being treated by a non-participating dentist who practices in closer proximity. • 23 other states have enacted assignment of benefits laws. SEP TEM BER/OC TOBER 2018 | P EN N SYLVAN IA DEN TAL JOURNAL 7