September/October 2017 | Page 9

G ove r n men t Re lat ions Harkening back to the days of former Governor Ed Rendell, the General Assembly and Governor Tom Wolf haggled over the state budget long after it was to have passed by the constitutionally-mandated deadline of June 30. While legislators were in town most of the summer and conducted some business, PDA’s issues stagnated along with everyone else’s, a casualty of contentious budget negotiations. • Supporting programs and policies aimed at improving oral health. • Representing dentistry’s interests on issues pertaining to the Affordable Care Act. Call to Action: Contact your Senator to Request Support for Assignment of Benefits Legislation We will spend the remainder of the fall session fighting for our assignment of benefits legislation, and more funding for the primary care loan forgiveness program and other important programs to improve access to dental care. We also continue to monitor and respond to a number of other bills introduced this session that impact dentistry, including opioid prescribing and monitoring measures, legislation allowing for health care services provided remotely (commonly referred to as “telemedicine” and “teledentistry”) and Affordable Care Act reforms. The Issue PDA’s Legislative Priorities PDA has a commitment from Senate leadership and staff to move SB 373 out of the Senate Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee this fall. We are asking you to contact your Senator immediately and request support for SB 373. The legislative session, which commenced in January 2017, allows PDA two years in which to advocate on members’ behalf for these important insurance and access to care initiatives: • Assignment of benefits for non-participating providers • Health practitioner student loan forgiveness and tangential loan mitigation issues. • Increased funding in the Medical Assistance program for dental providers. • Representing dentistry’s interests on issues pertaining to implementation of the Affordable Care Act (or its repeal) at the state level. While PDA takes a focused approach in limiting its primary advocacy efforts to these three issues, we continue to monitor and address these issues: • All insurance issues, such as balance billing, coordination of benefits and credentialing. • Prescription drug prescribing authority, abuse and patient monitoring. • Maintaining funding for the Donated Dental Services program. • Protecting the current dental team model and patients’ safety by limiting or restricting the unsupervised practice of non-dentists. • All other workforce and scope of practice issues. Rep. Stan Saylor (R-York) and Sen. John Eichelberger (R-Blair) introduced companion (identical) assignment of benefits legislation in the House and Senate. HB 823 and SB 373 would require insurers to honor patients’ requests to directly assign benefits to dentists, regardless of whether the dentist participates with the insurer. Requiring assignment of benefits would reduce administrative and financial burdens for both patients and dentists. PDA is aggressively lobbying for enactment of assignment of benefits legislation, having spent much of 2016 and the beginning of 2017 working with Senate and House leaders and staff on language that satisfied their concerns about adequate consumer protection safeguards in place when it comes to the issue of non-participating dentists accepting the assigned benefit and balance billing patients. Stay tuned for more information in upcoming editions of the Pennsylvania Dental Journal. Take Action Look to see if your senator cosponsored SB 373 and thank them for their support. Cosponsors include: Sens. Greenleaf, Regan, Rafferty, Costa, Brewster, Browne, Argall, Mensch, Ward, Vogel and Boscola. Talking Points on Assignment of Benefits • Patients should have the right to decide where to direct payment for dental care. Some patients cannot see their preferred dentist because some insurance companies do not directly pay the non-participating provider and they cannot afford to pay for services upfront. Dentists who do not require advanced payment may never be paid for services rendered. This insurance practice unfairly inhibits patients from seeking care SEP TEM BER/OC TOBER 2017 | P EN N SYLVAN IA DEN TAL JOURNAL 7