Pennsylvania 2018 December 2018 | Page 10

the majority of patients experienced less difficulty voiding with the earlier catheter removal. For those who did experience difficulty, there was more time for interventions, enhancing an earlier discharge. Patient Engagement Engaging the patient in their plan of care can impact outcomes associated with mobility, pain management and discharge (Gwynne-Jones, Martin, & Crane, 2017; McCann-Spry, Pelton, Grandy, & Newell, 2016). Patients are educated to request pain medication prior to getting OOB and working with physical ther- apy. During the pre-operative joint education classes and immediately post-operatively, the probability of discharge on POD 1 is discussed with the patient. All disciplines make it a point to involve the patient and family in goal setting and interventions throughout all points in the TJR continuum of care. OUTCOMES Average LOS for TJR patients progressed from 4.85 days in calendar year (CY) 2011, prior to any inter- ventions, to 1.82 days in CY 2017. In CY 2013, 50% (n = 592) of patients were mobi- lized on POD 0. Following implementation of the standard for either a nurse or PT team member to initiate mobilization on POD 0 in CY 2014, the per- centage has progressively increased to 98% (n = 750) in CY 2017. During this same time period, the percent of PT evaluations on POD 0 went from 30% (n = 592) in CY 2013 to 98% (n = 750) in CY 2017. The trend for patient satisfaction, evidenced by the Press Ganey overall nursing score, is upward, begin- ning in CY 2011. DISCUSSION A key factor in the success of this initiative was interprofessional collaboration, particularly between nursing and PT. Leaders from both disciplines role- modeled partnership, communicated similar expecta- tions and held their staff accountable. Willingness of the PT staff to change their work hours to assist in getting patient OOB on POD 0 sent a powerful Issue 73, 2 2018 Pennsylvania Nurse 8 message of willingness to work together for optimal patient outcomes. Another success factor was engagement of the 30 nurses, 16 non-licensed assistive personnel and seven PT staff. An initial tactic to gain this buy-in was interprofessional education to these three roles, focusing on the evidence associated with outcome improvements. The unit nurse manager and educator then appointed nurse champions on both shifts, who met with them and PT leaders weekly. This group discussed what was going well, as well as compliance barriers. These discussions were then shared with the entire staff, seeking their suggestions for ongoing pro- cess improvement strategies. Night shift champions were instrumental to project success by assuring all patients were assisted to get OOB on POD 0. Real-time and transparent data were also critical to success. Length of stay, mobility and PT evaluations on POD 0 were gathered, shared with all interprofes- sional staff on a weekly basis, and necessary adjust- ments made. The upward trend in the overall nursing patient satisfaction score could be perceived as related to intervention tactics associated with decreasing LOS. However, in June 2012, the same time clinical care standards were starting to change, the orthopedic unit was moved from an older building with smaller, semi-private rooms to a new building with large, private rooms. In addition, this new unit included a PT gym area, with multiple options to prepare for discharge, such as a model to practice getting in and out of a car. These environmental changes could have impacted patient satisfaction, along with the clinical care changes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE Partnerships between nurses and interprofessional colleagues, as well as the patient and family, are paramount to achieve optimal outcomes for patients. All clinical care tactics described in this article were driven by nurses and involved collaboration with PT managers and staff, surgeons, and anesthesiologists. Exemplary professional practice in Magnet® orga- nizations is evidenced by effective and efficient care services, interprofessional collaboration, and high- quality patient outcomes (American Nurses Creden- tialing Center, 2017). This organization’s journey to