Peace & Stability Journal Volume 8, Issue 2 | Page 20

YPJ sniper at the Raqqa frontline in November 2016. 13 November 2016. Wikimedia Commons photo Source: Kurdishstruggle, https://www.flickr.com/photos/kurdishstruggle/30867676501/ In the past several years, scholarly and practitioner communities have been focusing on female participation in violent non-state groups, like terrorist and insurgent organizations. Seeking an- swers to “why women rebel” is important for not only building secure communities and stable countries, but may also contrib- ute to international peace. To help build fuller answers, howev- er, we need to include female participation in militias as part of the conversation as well. Conceptually, women in conflict have been understudied almost as much as militias. Militias, as a type of violent non- state actor, have not warranted the same amount of attention as terrorist, insurgent and organized crime groups. In many ways, paramilitaries have been consigned to the “remainder bin” of sub-state groups. Militias are local guardians that view them- selves in a defensive light, protecting a specific political, ethnic, tribal, religious or familial group from harm due to gaps that the state is believed to be unable or unwilling to bridge. As local 18 guardians, militias act to provide political power, public safety, or social autonomy for their particular communities. Crucially, militias are linked to an important portion of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda--the connection between security for women, state security and international stability. Empirical studies have demonstrated that countries with higher rates of gender equality are less likely to use mili- tary force to settle disputes. 1 Simply put, a nation’s respect for women’s rights also makes it more pacific in its foreign policy. Militias, like other violent non-state actors, have been connect- ed to high levels of violence against women. 2 However, as the WPS agenda makes clear, women must also be viewed as active agents, rather than solely as passive victims, in conflicts. Female participation in militias complicates the links between wom- en, state security and international peace. Women have served as key mobilizers for militia recruitment. For example, older female community leaders controlled youth’s access to marriage-