Peace & Stability Journal Volume 7, Issue 2 | Page 21

Introduction With the ink barely dry on an Army memorandum appoint- ing PKSOI as the Army lead for Women Peace and Security (WPS), PSOTEW brought forth the perfect venue to advance WPS issues. This was the first time WPS was addressed as a working group in 11 PSOTEWs. The working group brought together an experienced and energetic array of participants from academia, civil society, and government representatives to advance DOD Joint Staff ( JS) planning and integration of Women, Peace and Security (WPS) efforts. Participants hailed from the UN, the USG’s Depart- ment of State, OSD-SHA, JS J5/J7, USAID, AFRICOM, PACOM, NORTHCOM, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), National Defense University NDU, PKSOI, and the USAF Air Advisor Academy, as well as civil society representatives from USIP, Inclusive Security, the Folke Bernadotte Academy, Peace Operations Training Institute (POTI), and other committed WPS SMEs. The USG is deeply committed to the participation of women in advancing peace and security throughout the world. Consis- tent with this commitment, in December 2011 the inaugural US National Action Plan (NAP) on WPS was released to help chart a course for the USG to advance women's inclusion in conflict and insecurity mitigation. In 2016, the NAP was up- dated to identify areas that call for new or renewed focus. The following five pillars are the core tenets of the NAP and DOD objectives: 1. National Integration and Institutionalization: institute a gender sensitive approach to defense/stability related work in complex environments 2. Participation in Peace Processes and Decision-Making: improve participation of women at all levels of decision-mak- ing, peace negotiations, security initiatives, and conflict prevention 3. Protection from Violence: strengthen DOD efforts to prevent and protect women and children from harm, ex- ploitation, sexual abuse, and gender based violence 4. Conflict Prevention: promote women’s roles in conflict prevention and improve conflict early warning response sys- tems through integration of a gender perspective 5. Access to Relief and Recovery: always consider gender perspectives in recovery and reconciliation processes, as well as other components of the host nation’s (re)development WG 5 Objectives The purpose of WG 5 was to develop a comprehensive approach to education and training regarding WPS impacts on peace and stability operations. We were grateful to have partner orga- nizations lead the work on our breakout sessions. The specific objectives and conveners of the WG sessions were as follows: ■ Develop or contribute to a milestone plan for updating the DOD Implementation Guide on WPS ( Joint Staff J5) ■ Conduct a review and reconcile WPS Terminology at the Strategic and Operational Levels ( Joint Staff J5) ■ Review the framework of the Commander’s Handbook to Gender Dynamics in Military Operations (PKSOI) ■ Conduct a review (stock take) on available training courses on WPS; investigate updating JKO ( Joint Staff J7) The outcomes from each of these sessions are highlighted below. More specific and detailed information can be requested from PKSOI points of contact. WG 5 Deliverables DOD Implementation Plan Framework With the updated NAP, the WG concluded that congruent updates to the DOD implementation guidelines on WPS should be linked to the 2016 NAP. There was consensus on a proposed framework for updating the guidelines as developed during the WG session. The WG emphasized the importance of incorporating reporting processes and communications strategies into the DOD Implementation Plan, while agreeing on the need to further developed metrics that align with the reporting process. WPS Terminology The WG conducted a thorough review of relevant termin- ology and concepts drawn from official USG, NATO and UN resources. When necessary and available, NATO and UN definitions supplemented USG versions. These accepted terms 19