Peace & Stability Journal Volume 7, Issue 2 | Page 16

The group also kept in mind that what is most important to the mission team is what is directly affecting its immediate area. The BAIT assessments should be of the local subgroup of the transnational criminal organization and its activities conducted in the mission environment. The assessment should not focus on the organizations illicit activities around the world, although an overview dossier would be useful to ensure a contextual grasp of its activities and capabilities. Uncertain what precisely the local con- ditions will be for those who collect the indicators needed to populate the BAIT template, the group recommended that the UN ensure flexibility and a usable format considering the method most ap- plicable for use in the field, which could be as sophisticated as a smartphone appli- cation, or as simple as a printed hardcopy checklist. As noted, much discussion centered on the development and delivery of effect- ive training for employing the BAIT template. Among these considerations was the need to establish a common understanding of the TOC threat to the achievement of the mission mandate; without this critical contextual component, analysts may not fully appreciate why they are collecting this information or conducting assessments. It will also be critical that training includes baseline computer and Excel skills to ensure intended users have the technical capability to appropriately employ the tool. The BAIT model requires a clear understanding of the entire analytic process from operational reporting to information analysis at all levels. Processes are differentiated by user levels, such as collectors in the field, as opposed to analysts at the mission level, who will predominantly populate the template and ensure its integrity. The next level of user will be the Joint Operations Center (JOC) analyst, who will conduct more robust analysis and develop additional assessments and products using its outputs. A final level will occur at UN mission analysis, where they will generate new requirements, while also using the data in the template and from assessments to inform tactical, operational and strategic decisions. 14 The 2017 WG was fortunate to be comprised of a diverse set of participants from across the U.S. defense, peacekeeping, academic and nongovernmental communities, each offering a unique perspective. PKSOI is grateful for all of their participa- tion and support in developing this tool, as well as validating its utility, especially in its improved form, thanks to their insights. Going forward, the group agreed to continue the conversation through regular email updates and discussions through the next PSOTEW, as PKSOI works with the UN and other potential users to endeavor to implement all this deep thought and hard work on behalf of the goals of peace and stabilization.