Paesaggio Urbano 02.2013 | Page 9

senza cadere nella trappola di una distruzione silenziosa così tanto ovunque praticata anche in assenza degli effetti degli eventi sismici; dall’altro si deve anche comprendere come il grado di analisi e verifica dell’esistente in rapporto agli indicatori della sicurezza strutturale e della sostenibilità (contestualmente interpretati) permettano di affrontare diversamente l’approccio al patrimonio edilizio esistente (storico e non) e al suo innesco al recupero. A marzo la Piattaforma Costruzioni della Rete Alta Tecnologia Emilia-Romagna con tutti i suoi laboratori di ricerca, innovazione e trasferimento tecnologico in forte accordo con gli organizzatori del Salone del Restauro di Ferrara, Regione Emilia-Romagna e Direzione regionale del MIBAC mettono a disposizione un and to make the value of the built heritage explicit by considering the reality of the true substance and the constructive quality related to its preserved condition and, therefore, to its vulnerability. The earthquake unveils the deceit, though it’s not responsible for it. This is how the play with words, so dear to the 20th century debates in architecture about the reconstruction (or renewal) styles that can be applied to a historical artefact, is changed by adding the negation (so that we maintain the poetic pleasure related to the idea of unveiling), so that the debate opens to the discussions about what should be done and how it should be done in the coming months. Where it was, but not as it was is the expression, already launched at SAIE 2012 (the Innovation Building Exhibition) by Emilia-Romagna High Technology Network Construction Platform, that represents the core and the leading theme of the 20th Salone del Restauro held in Ferrata from 20th to 23rd March so that we can explore the many deceits. Where it was, but not as it was also represents a strategic asset to connect the major issues related to the reconstruction in Emilia to those of the urban renovati