Onshore Energy Conference — London Onshore Energy Conference — London | Page 48

The average American spends about a week a year stuck in traffic jams level, our planet will be dealing with the limits of growth. And with that growth comes some severe practical problems, one of which is our transportation system simply won’t be able to deal with it.” Whilst it was possible to ignore Ford’s commentary back in 2011, the subsequent growth of Uber, car-sharing and autonomous vehicles suggests it would be unwise to continue to adopt a head-in-the-sands approach to the secular changes underway. In turn, this suggests that forecasts for US GDP need to be revised downwards, to take account of the impact of a downturn in new car sales. It would seem prudent to use Ford’s forecast of a potential 30% downturn as a base case, which would mean a $250bn loss in terms of the value of new car sales by 2020, or perhaps earlier. 4 Hard choices near for UK’s Brexit options The famous Irish phrase seems to aptly describe the present state of UK government policy on Brexit. UK premier, Theresa May, famously started her period in office by stating that “Brexit means Brexit”. But unfortunately, her recent speech to the Conservative Party conference suggested that she has still not decided which of the possible Brexit options to pursue. Yet time is running out, as she did reveal that she intends to begin Article 50 negotiations in Q1 next year, meaning that the UK will be leaving the EU by March 2019. May problem is that she will soon have to choose which option to pursue during the negotiations, unless she shares the belief of her Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, that it is possible to “have our cake and eat it”. We rather share the downbeat view of EU Council president Donald Tusk: “To all who believe in it, I propose a simple experiment. Buy a cake, eat it, 48 If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will do and see if it is still there on the plate. “The brutal truth is that Brexit will be a loss for all of us. There will be no cakes on the table. For anyone. There will be only salt and vinegar.” This means that May is likely to have to choose between five very different options, as the authoritative Institute for Government has confirmed: • Membership of the European Economic Area (EEA): the ‘Norway model’. This offers almost complete access to the Single Market in goods and services, with some restrictions on agricultural and fisheries products. In return for this access, EEA members must accept free movement of people. They make a significant contribution to the EU budget and must accept all EU laws and regulations related to the Single Market, with minimal influence over their content. • Membership of the European Free Trade Agreement (EFTA) plus bilateral deals: the ‘Swiss model’. EFTA provides access to the Single Market in all non-agricultural goods. Switzerland has added a series of bilateral agreements allowing for trade in some services, and also has a treaty accepting free movement of people. Switzerland contributes to the EU budget to cover the costs of programmes where it participates. It must also adapt domestic legislation to meet EU laws in the areas of the Single Market where it participates, but has no formal influence over those laws.