ON Chiropractic Spring 2016 | Page 12

FEATURE STORY/ YOU'VE BEEN SERVED T he Canadian Chiropractic Protective Association was founded after the main liability insurance provider for Canadian chiropractors withdrew coverage from all of its chiropractic clients essentially overnight. Dr. Bob Haig, CEO of the Ontario Chiropractic Association, was a member of the CCA’s insurance committee. His blood pressure still rises when he remembers the day that call came. “It changed everything,” he said. “Suddenly every chiropractor in Canada was at risk.” The CCA got to work and changed that challenge into an opportunity. This was one of the most visionary decisions made in Canadian chiropractic history. Led by Dr. Paul Carey, the CCA founded the CCPA in 1986. The objective was to ensure that the chiropractic profession would never be in such a precarious position again. The CCPA’s founding principle is to protect chiropractors and their profession and over the subsequent 30 years, they have become the envy of many health care professions. Today the service the CCPA provides goes beyond lawsuits. It now provides legal counsel to members facing regulatory board actions as well. They also have a robust and expanding risk management program for members. This includes the development of continuing education on a range of 12 SPRING 2016 topics, the eye-opening Ouch File and ongoing efforts to ensure that chiropractors are using best possible practices in their clinics. The recent update to the CCPA Informed Consent form is an example. In 1986, inaugural CCPA dues were about $1,000 for $500,000 in protection. Today the CCPA offers $5 million in protection for about $1,500. And it gets better. We have all seen what happens to insurance rates from profit-seeking companies when a claim is made. When a CCPA member makes a claim, the only long-term repercussions are a forfeiture of their claims’ free credit and an increase on their total dues invoice by roughly $100. O nce the statement of claim is filed, the CCPA sets to work preparing a response. The chiropractors involved typically write a statement of their own. The objective in this exercise is to document their recollection of the events leading up to and including the incident in question. It is not uncommon for this document to begin when the chiropractor first encountered the patient, which means that some of these statements can be very long. The process of writing a statement is challenging for two reasons. First, the statement is meant to be factual. It is hard for human beings to fight the urge to lash out by questioning the integrity of the patient and their account of events. Writing a proper, factual account in response to a statement of claim feels a bit like being asked to explain Robert’s Rules of Order to a charging bear. The bear is neither interested in civility nor decorum. The second reason is even harder to navigate. Anxiety about a case can take on a life of its own as a statement is written. Invariably the questions arise: Did I miss something? Was I too aggressive? Why did I choose that intervention? These questions can easily escape the confines of a legal case and infiltrate your entire practice. One chiropractor began wondering if he should stop using ART altogether simply because the patient in the claim against him had been treated with that modality. This may seem like a surprising overreaction, but the emotional and professional impact of a lawsuit should not be underestimated. Even confident and experienced chiropractors may begin second guessing their entire approach to care simply because of a claim. Once the statement is complete, the process enters a long, quiet phase. The CCPA works in the background to prepare the full response to the case. Legal wrangling is underway. Expert witnesses are being sought out and