ON Chiropractic Spring 2015 | Page 14

FEATURE STORY/ WHEN THE NERVOUS SYSTEM PANICS study’s discussion section, “we assumed that SMT-evoked supraspinal effects would impact pain sensitivity at both trigger points comparably.” The study only showed significant changes at the segmentally linked trigger point, indicating segmental rather than supraspinal mechanisms. Researchers continue to examine whether SMT’s effect is predominantly regional, general or a combination of the two. This study showed a significant difference in pain thresholds in the infraspinatus (as compared to the gluteus medius) at 3 and 5 minutes, suggesting that dry needle stimulation can evoke short-term pain reduction within a neurological segment. This was not a surprise to Dr. Srbely. He points out that the World Health Organization’s list of diseases and disorders that can be treated with acupuncture is multi-systemic in scope. If SMT proves to be an effective modulator of C-Sens, this may open up a significant role in our health care system for chiropractors as the gate-keepers of clinical conditions associated with C-Sens, such as myofascial pain syndrome. Other Manual Therapies S pinal manipulative therapy is not the only mechanism proposed to ease C-Sens. Several other therapies have also shown promise in this area. Acupuncture D r. Srbely’s team performed a very similar study in 2010 that examined the effect of dry needle stimulation of myofascial trigger points, again by comparing trigger points in the infraspinatus and gluteus medius muscles. Rather than receiving SMT, subjects in this study received intramuscular dry needle puncture at a right supraspinatus trigger point which is neurologically linked to the infraspinatus muscle at C5. 14 SPRING 2015 Controlled trials have shown significant scientific support for acupuncture treatment of conditions including colic, headache, neck pain, low back pain, stroke, morning sickness and depression. “There must be a common mechanism that is linking all of these conditions,” Dr. Srbely says. “When I started digging deeper into this, my hypothesis began to emerge: central sensitization.” Ultrasound D r. Srbely’s team performed a similar study in 2008 which examined the effect of ultrasound, again by comparing trigger points in the infraspinatus and gluteus medius muscles. Test subjects in this study received low-dose ultrasound to a right supraspinatus (C5) trigger point while control subjects received a sham ultrasound exposure. Significant difference in pain thresholds were found in the infraspinatus (as compared to the gluteus medius) at 1, 3 and 5 minutes, demonstrating that ultrasound can evoke short-term pain reduction within a segment. And More I f the above modalities are using gate control to reduce C-Sens, it is very possible that this same mechanism may also be responsible for the therapeutic effects observed with active release therapy, massage therapy, exercise, movement and more. Remaining Research Questions W hile there is now enough research data to begin connecting the dots, several outstanding areas of research still remain. These questions will need to be understood in more depth before chiropractors can use this research to guide patient care or to make claims for the effectiveness of SMT for specific conditions. Current research questions include: ∞∞ How should patients with C-Sens be identified in the clinic? How should their care differ? Do sensitized patients require a gentler approach to avoid aggravating their sensitivity to pain input? ∞∞ Why might C-Sens affect some patients more than others? ∞∞ How can we measure the degree of central sensitization? This is important both for clinicians caring for patients