Obiter Dicta Issue 6 - November 18, 2013 | Page 11

PAGE 11 arts and culture A trio of film reviews, currently in theaters KENDALL GRANT Contributor Efficient, gorgeous, and thrilling, Gravity delivers exactly what it promises: a suspense tale in space with dazzling visuals. Is it better than 2001: A Space Odyssey? Is it better than director Alfonso Cuarón’s Y Tu Mamá También or reproach. Yes, he should have won Academy Awards for Children of Men and The Tree of Life. But a win here would be well-deserved. You feel as if you’ve taken a ride through the stars. There are some heart-stopping stills. The reason for the film’s lack of resonance, compared to Cuarón’s previous Mexican roadtrip extravaganza and dystopian adaptation, is the film’s fleeting impact. It grips you for every second that it lasts, and then it lets you go. You leave satisfied, but not challenged. You leave invigorated, but not moved. The story and the script are simplistic, almost window dressing meant to prop up the brilliance of the effects. Gravity is a rousing crowd-pleaser from someone with serious filmmaking talent. Everyone should see it in IMAX 3D. Lubezki should probably win the Oscar. Just don’t go calling it the best movie of the year. Blue Jasmine (2013) 3/4 DELIGHTFUL, tonally sound, and uncomfortably hilarious, Blue Jasmine finds Woody Allen back in fine form after a schizophrenically inconsistent string of films that ran the gamut between pleasantly diverting (see: Midnight in Paris) and maddeningly sketchy (see: To Rome with Love). Much of the film’s success has to do with Cate Blanchett’s marvelous performance as the neurotic, Xanax-popping title character. Fragile, anxious, infuriating, showy and vindictive, her anti-hero makes the film 12 Years a Slave (2013) 3.5/4 mesmerizing even when Allen GEORGE CLOONEY IN GRAVITY Excruciatingly brutal yet undeniably powerful, loses his focus. Undeniably, she 12 Years a Slave is a soul-splintering descent sets a new standard for dysinto hell, a harrowing journey through the functional people. Blanchett’s work is OscarChildren of Men? No and no. But is a roaring inner workings of an institution that robbed calibre, and may snag her the golden statue good time. A short running time of less than people of freedom, family, and dignity. itself. 90 minutes and a series of (slightly) implausible Chiwetel Eijofor gives an astonishing perforEach member of the supporting cast has the narrative twists ratchets up the tension until it’s mance, following up his fine work in Children of opportunity to do something memorable, and nearly unbearable, holding most audience memMen by embodying Solomon Northup to heartestablished talents and new faces rise to the bers on the edge of their seats until the credits. breaking effect. The man is persistent, hardoccasion. They are wonderful almost without It will wind you up and wring you out. working, committed, sure, but he is also angry exception: Michael Stuhlbarg as the leering George Clooney and Sandra Bullock do and broken and torn between survival and how dentist, Peter Sarsgaard as the aspiring far to push a politician, Sally Hawkins as the frumpy system that sister, Louis C.K. as the doting lover. const a nt ly The lovely and dynamic surprises are the works against unknowns that jump off the screen: Alden him. With Ehrenreich as the estranged son, Andrew unparalleled Dice Clay as the divorced husband, and rage, malice, Bobby Cannavale as the eternal target of and obsession, Jasmine’s biting attacks. Michael FassRestructuring Tennessee Williams’ bender distimeless “A Streetcar Named Desire” someappears into what problematically, Allen nevertheless Edwin Epps pulls off an impressive screenplay laced and handles with dark, scathing humour and compelthe toughling characters. The film also acts as the est scenes most effective and naturalistic ode to San in the film Francisco as anything Allen has done on (the dehuhis “world tour.” manization CHIWETEL EIJOFOR IN 12 YEARS A SLAVE If it remains partially saddled with of Eijo typical Allen flourishes and shortcomfor, Lupita ings (a lack of refinement, some clunky more than solid work, although Clooney dab- N’yongo, and others through rape, lashing, and narrative unevenness, a hard-to-swallow dose bles in some celebrity-speak and B ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????)?????????????????????????????????)????????????????????????? ??????? ??????????????????????????????? ???)?????)????????????????????????????????????)?????????M????A??????????????????????)???????????L??????)???????L?????????????????)?????????????)?????????????????????????????A????????)??????????????????????????????????????!??????????????????????????????)?????????????????????)????????????????)?????????????????????????????????)Q???????????????????????????????)???????????)1??????????????????????????+ ??????????????????)Q???=???????$()5?????9????????????((0