KURSER, FORELESNINGER & ”HANDS-ON”
– INNEN KIRURGI
Vi på Unident arrangerer kurser og foreles-
ninger innen kirurgi med interessante emner,
samt foredragsholdere med bred kunnskap
og lang erfarenhet.
Les mer om våre kurser på
unident.no
LER MER OM VÅRE KIRURGI-
PRODUKTER PÅ UNIDENT.NO
Indication
Sheet PIR3
Se videoklipp om våre
kirurgiske produkter og last
ned kliniske kasus som pdf.
Fig. 19 The
Peri-implan
t Augmen
occlusal
view clearly
free primary
shows
in the soft closure with no evidence the tension-
tissues. As
of ischaemia
is
used in the
region of the customary, 5-0 sutures
ridge.
are
Fig. 22 The
peri-apical
X-ray shows
mally integrated
the implant
in the bone.
nor-
Fig. 25 Clinical
tissue condition findings after completio
n of the
ing with
peri-impla
nt soft tissues the temporary crown. soft-
progress.
now exhibit
The
good aesthetic
Fig. 28 Clinical
findings at
aesthetic
the 4-year
result is stable.
follow-up.
is evident
The
Only a small
in
difference
the 29-year-o the incisal edge, which
ld patient
suggests that
growth in
the alveolar is still exhibiting
residual
process.
Fig. 31 The
oro-facial
pletely intact
DVT section
shows
facial wall
in thickness
approximately a com-
. This is the
2 mm
augmenta
result of a
tion using
GBR contour
autogeno
Geistlich Bio-Oss
®
, covered by us bone chips and
membrane
a Geistlich
and primary
Bio-Gide ®
soft-tissue
closure.
Fig. 20 The
clinical findings
implantation
one week
operation
and the temporary
show normal following the
partial prosthesis wound healing
in situ.
Fig. 23 Status
been punched following exposure:
the mucosa
and a longer
introduced.
titanium healing has
cap
Fig. 26 Clinical
the definitive findings at the 1-year
follow-up
metal ceramic
aesthetic treatment
after
crown was
placed. The
result is excellent.
Fig. 29 X-ray
findings at
peri-impla
the 4-year
nt bony conditions
follow-up.
The
are absolutely
stable.
1
Fig. 24 One
week later,
well around
the soft tissues
the
have healed
now commenc titanium cap. The
prosthetic
tioned using es and the soft
phase
tissues are
the temporary
condi-
crown.
Early impl
antation with
augmenta
simultane
tion
and Prof. Urs using the techniqu ous GBR for contour
e by Prof.
Belser, Univ
Dani
ersit
el Buse
y of Berne,
> Implantation
Switzerland r
4
> Implantation to 8 weeks following
extraction
with simult
aneous contou
result
r augmentation
for a stable
long-term
Fig. 27 X-ray
The dental findings 1 year following
X-ray shows
grated in the
the implant implantation.
bone.
optimally
inte-
Fig. 30 The
clinical findings
exhibit an
at the 7-year
aesthetica
follow-up
lly
with intact
papillae and attractive long-term
tissue recession
result
no indication
at all of soft-
. The convex
the region
soft-tissue
of
contour in
edge has not the implant crown is
noted. The
increased
incisal
further.
References
Araujo MG,
Sukekava F,
Wennstrom
Periodontol
JL, Lindhe
32:645-52.
J (2005). Ridge
Araujo MG,
alterations
Sukekava F,
following
Wennstrom
Buser D, von
JL, Lindhe
Arx T (2000).
J (2006). Tissue
Surgical procedur
modeling following
Buser D, Martin
es in partially
W, Belser UC
Implants 19
edentulous
(2004). Optimizin
Suppl:43-61.
patients with
g esthetics
Buser D, Bornstei
for implant
restorations
n MM, Weber
Single-Tooth
HP, Grutter
Extraction
L, Schmid
6
in the Esthetic
Buser D, Chen
Zone: A Cross-Sec B, Belser UC (2008a).
ST, Weber
Ear
HP, Belser
tional, Retrospe
Int J Periodon
UC (2008b).
tics Restorati
ctive Study
Early implant
7
ve Dent 28:441-51
Buser D, Hart
placement
.
C, Bornstein
following sing
zone: 12-month
M, Grütter
L, Chappuis
results of a
8
V, Belser UC
prospective
Buser D, Wittnebe
(2009). Early
study with
20 consecut
implant p
in the Esthetic n J, Bornstein M, Grütter
ive patients.
Zone. 3-Year
L, Chappuis
J Periodon
9
V, Belser UC
Results of
t
Buser D, Chappuis
a Prospect
ive Study with (2011). Stability of Early
V, Bornstein
Extraction
C
M, Wittnebe
Early Implant
in the Esthetic
Placement
10
Zone: A prospect n J, Frei M, Belser UC
Chen ST, Darby
(2013). Long-term
ive, cross-sec
IB, Adams
11
tional Study
Stabili
GG, Reynolds
Chen ST, Buser
in 41 Patients
EC (2005).
with a
A prospecti
sites. Treatmen D (2008). Implant placemen
ve clinical
study of bone
t options.
t in post-extr
12
ITI Treatmen
aug
action sites:
Dawson A,
t Guide, Vol.
Chen S (eds)
A literature
3, Quintess
13
update.
(2009) The
ence Publ.
Evans CJD,
SAC Classifica
Chen ST (2008).
tion in Implant
14
Esthetic outcome
Fickl S, Zuhr
Dentistry.
Quintessence
s of immediat
O,
J Clin Periodon Wachtel H, Bolz W,
e implant placemen
Hürzeler M
tol
35:356-63
ts. Clin Oral
(2008). Tissue
15
.
Hämmerle
alterations
CH, Chen
after tooth
ST, Wilson
Int J Oral Maxillofa
extrac
TG, Jr. (2004).
c Implants
Consensus
16
19 Suppl1:26
Kan JYK, Rungchar
statements
-28.
and recomme
assaeng K,
guided bone
nded clin
Sclar A, Lozada
regeneration:
JL (2007).
17
1-year results.
Martin WC,
J Oral Maxillofa Effects of the facial
Morton D,
osseous defect
Buser D (2006).
c Surg 65:13-19.
Tooth Replacem
m
Diagnostic
ents. ITI Treatmen
18
factors for
Martin WC,
t Guide, Vol.
esthetic risk
Morton D,
1, Quintess
assessment.
Buser D (2006).
replacements.
ence Publ.,
In: Buse
Pp. 11-20.
Diagnostic
D Buser, U
19
factors for
Belser and
Wood DL,
esthetic risk
D Wismeije
Hoag PM,
r editors. Berlin:
assessment.
Donnenfeld
In: ITI T
Quintessence
OW, Rosenfeld
Publishing
LD (1972).
Co, L
Alveolar crest
reduction
following ful
2
3
4
5
1. Indication
Suppliers
Profile
Region
Bone Situatio
n
Soft Tissue
Situation
Bone Augme
ntation Indicate
d
Implantation
Fig. 32 The
completely horizontal DVT section
intact facial
shows
3-dimensionally
bone structures the
slightly palatal correctly placed
in a
implant.
position of
important
The
the implant
: this allows
here
the bony regenerat
adequate
space facially is
ion.
for
tation
Fig. 21 Clinical
merged healing findings after 8
weeks. The
and the implant phase of the implant
sub-
porary restoratio can now be uncovered is complete
for the tem-
n.
Fig. 33 The
aesthetic
treatment
as seen in
result is excellent
the clinical
smile line.
image with
a distinct
high
n Aesthet
ic region
n No bony
defect present
n Primary
wound closure
quite feasible
n Yes, immedi
ately
n Yes, on
implantation
n No
n Yes, 4 –
8 weeks followin
g the extracti
on
n Non-ae
sthetic region
n Crater-s
haped defect
in the facial
n Primary
bony wall
wound closure
difficult
n No
> Implant
: Straumann
Standard Plus,
> Suture materia
Tissue Level
l: Polypropylene,
SLA; Institut
> Medicat
e Strauma
monofilament,
ion: Antibio
nn, Basle,
5-0; Hu Friedy,
S
tic prophyl
Concurrent
axis 2 hours
Rotterdam,
rinsing with
before the
Holland
chlorhexidine
> Biologic
al materials:
digluconate surgical procedure.
Up to 3 da
(0.1%) 3x daily.
Geistlich Bio-Oss
®
0.5 g (0.25
mm–1 mm),
Geistlich Bio-Gid
e ®
Contact
> Prof. Daniel
Buser, Oral
Surgery and
Telephone:
+41 (0)31 632
Stomatology
25 55, Fax:
Clinic, Univers
+41 (0)31 632
98 84, e-mail: ity of Berne, Freiburg
daniel.buser@zm
k.unib
Further Indic
ation Shee
ts
> For free
copies, please
> If you would
go to: www.ge
like to stop
istlich.com/ind
receiving Indicati
icationsheets.
on Sheets,
please advise
your local
5
1
6
SIDE | 47
8
Bestill i vår webshop
shop.unident.no
(
Bestill av vår kundetjeneste
Tlf: 33 03 57 70
distributor.