NIV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible CBSB_Digital Sampler | Page 33

Matthew 1:25  | 1609 from Da­vid to the ex­ile to Bab­ylon, and four­teen from the ex­ile to the Mes­si­ah. Joseph Accepts ­Jesus as His Son 18  This is how the b ­ irth of J ­ esus the Mes­ si­ah came ­about  a : His moth­er Mary was pledged to be mar­ried to Jo­seph, but be­ fore they came to­geth­er, she was f ­ ound to be preg­nant ­through the Holy Spir­it.  o 19  Be­ cause Jo­seph her hus­band was faith­ful to the law, and yet  b did not want to ex­pose her to pub­lic dis­grace, he had in mind to di­vorce  p her qui­et­ly. 20   But af­ter he had con­sid­ered this, an an­gel of the Lord ap­peared to him in a dream and said, “Jo­seph son of Da­vid, do not be ­afraid to take Mary home as your wife, be­cause what is con­ceived in her is 1:18 o  Lk 1:35 1:19 p  Dt 24:1 1:21 q  Lk 1:31 r  Lk 2:11; Ac 5:31; 13:23, ​ 28 1:23 s  Isa 7:14; 8:8, ​10 1:25 t  ver 21 note on v. 1). Some scholars point out that when “David” is spelled in Hebrew letters and calculated as numbers (Hebrew used letters also as numbers), it comes out to 14. Some other scholars attribute this to coi ncidence. 1:18  before they came together. Whenever possible, biographers of important figures reported the figures’ honorable ancestry, honorable behavior of their par- ents, or special circumstances surrounding their birth. Those who compare ­Jesus’ virgin birth to Greek stories about gods impregnating women, however, appeal to a milieu quite foreign to this account. In the Greek stories, the gods are many, are immoral, and impregnate women who are thus not virgins. Much more relevant are Biblical accounts of God empowering supernatural births in the OT (Ge 21:1 – 2; 25:21; 30:22; Jdg 13:3). Even among miracu- lous births, however, God does something new: J ­ esus is born not merely from someone previously unable to bear, but from a virgin. Greek men, on average, were more than ten years older than their brides, because Greeks had a shortage of mar- riageable women (sources suggest that girl babies were discarded more often than boys). Jewish men, however, were usually only a few years older than their wives; both genders assumed some adult responsibilities at puberty, but men would often work a few years so they could pro- vide financial stability for marriage. Betrothal involved a financial agreement between families. It often lasted about a year; in conservative Galilean families the couple could not be together alone before the wedding, so Joseph may not have known Mary very well. 1:19  divorce her quietly. More binding than modern Western engagements, betrothal could be ended only by divorce or by the death of one of the partners. Sexual unfaithfulness was grounds for divorce throughout the ancient world; both law and custom in fact required a man to divorce an unfaithful wife or fiancée. (Romans did not allow subject peoples to execute convicted persons without Roman permission in this period; although some lynchings may have occurred in secret, they were rare, so Mary likely faced divorce rather than death [see Lev 20:10].) A Jewish man who divorced a faithful wife had to refund the money she brought into the marriage (normally a gift from her father). In the case of an unfaithful wife, however, the husband could keep this money, plus he was entitled to a refund of any money he may have paid the father as a bride price. (Paying the father was the traditional Israel- ite custom; the father giving his daughter a monetary gift was a more recent but now widespread custom.) Joseph from the Holy Spir­it. 21  She will give b ­ irth to a son, and you are to give him the name ­Jesus,  c   q be­cause he will save his peo­ple from ­their sins.”  r 22  All this took p ­ lace to ful­fill what the Lord had said ­through the proph­et: 23  “The vir­gin will con­ceive and give b ­ irth to a son, and they will call him Im­man­u­el”  d   s (which m ­ eans “God with us”). 24  When Jo­ seph woke up, he did what the an­gel of the Lord had com­mand­ed him and took Mary home as his wife. 25  But he did not con­sum­mate their mar­riage un­til she gave ­birth to a son. And he gave him the name ­Jesus.  t a  18 Or The origin of ­Jesus the Messiah was like this    b  19 Or was a righteous man and    c  21  ­Jesus is the Greek form of Joshua, which means the L ord saves.    d  23 Isaiah 7:14    might thus have profited financially by divorcing Mary in front of elders, in a court setting. Instead, sensitive to her shame, he prefers a private divorce. A private divorce meant giving her a certificate of divorce, which would specify her freedom to marry someone else, in front of two or three witnesses. 1:20  angel. The angel of the Lord sometimes announced births (Ge 16:10; Jdg 13:3) and other events (e.g., Ge 22:15 – 18). This angel appears to Joseph especially in dreams (here; 2:13,19), a common way that God speaks in Scripture (e.g., Ge 20:3; 31:24; 1Ki 3:5), sometimes by his angel (Ge 31:11; cf. Ge 28:12). The first Joseph heard God through dreams (Ge 37:5,9). As here, divine mes- sages often encouraged people not to fear (e.g., Ge 15:1; 21:17; 26:24; 46:3). Greeks often reported dreams about deceased persons, but in Biblical dreams God or angels are the most common speakers. 1:21  Biblical birth announcements sometimes included these elements: a woman “will bear a son” (Ge 16:11; 17:19,21; Jdg 13:3,5) “and you will call his name” (Ge 16:11; 17:19; Isa 7:14; 8:3). ­Jesus is the same name in Greek as Joshua, which in its earliest form (Yehoshua) means “God is salvation” (eventually contracted to Yeshua). 1:22 – 23  to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: “The virgin will conceive . . . and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”). In context, the son of Isa 7:14 was a sign to King Ahaz, and was prob- ably Isaiah’s own son (Isa 7:10 – 17; 8:3 – 4). Isaiah’s children’s names were for “signs” to Israel (Isa 8:18). Nevertheless, Isa- iah’s son signified not only immediate deliverance in their own time, but pointed to the ultimate deliverance with the future birth of the ultimate Davidic ruler (Isa 9:6 – 7; cf. Isa 11:1 – 5). That would be the ultimate fulfillment of the promise of “Immanuel” (Isa 7:14), “God with us”: the king would himself be the “Mighty God” (Isa 9:6), a title for God elsewhere in Isaiah (Isa 10:21). Matthew has in mind the context of the entire section of Isaiah, which he again cites soon afterward (see Isa 9:1 – 2 in Mt 4:15 – 16). 1:24  took Mary home as his wife. If Mary’s pregnancy was known, Joseph could repudiate responsibility and per- haps evade suspicion by divorcing her. By instead marry- ing her, Joseph assumes responsibility for the pregnancy, embracing her shame. The couple could long be a mat- ter of village gossip. Joseph valued God’s direct calling through a dream more than what others thought of him. 1:25  did not consummate their marriage. Joseph and Mary could not avoid physical closeness; often newly married couples lived together in a small room on top of the home