NIV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible CBSB_Digital Sampler | Page 17

Genesis 5:2  | 15 25   Adam made love to his wife a ­ gain, and she gave b ­ irth to a son and n ­ amed him Seth,  a   s say­ing, “God has grant­ed me an­oth­er c ­ hild in ­place of Abel, ­since Cain killed him.”  t 26  Seth also had a son, and he named him Enosh. At that time peo­ple be­gan to call on  b the name of the L ord .  u 4:25 s  Ge 5:3 t  ver 8 4:26 u  Ge 12:8; 1Ki 18:24; Ps 116:17; Joel 2:32; Zep 3:9; Ac 2:21; 1Co 1:2 5:1 v  Ge 1:27; Eph 4:24; Col 3:10 4:26  call on the name of the L ord . Just as there is no implication that only Cain’s line had cities and the arts of civilization, so the text does not imply that only the line of Seth called on the name of the Lord. About a dozen times in the OT people are said to call on the name of the Lord — ​generally either calling for help in connec- tion with a ritual or invoking God’s presence at a cultic From Adam to Noah This is the writ­ten ac­count of ­Adam’s fam­i­ly line. 5 When God cre­at­ed man­kind, he made them in the like­ness of God.  v 2   He cre­at­ed a  25  Seth probably means granted.    b  26 Or to proclaim    site. Eventually humans sought to procure the presence of God through establishing cultic places and perform- ing rituals there, but here there is no indication of these trappings. Thus it seems that people began to invoke the Lord’s presence (the presence that was lost at the fall). This verse, then, represents the beginning of religion. GENESIS 4:26 T The Name of God he personal name “Yahweh” (NIV “L ord ”) is used frequently throughout Gen- esis. The patriarchs address God by that name, and God identifies himself by that name. But a problem surfaces in Exodus: At the burning bush Moses asks what name he should give for the God who is sending him — ​even though God has already identified himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Ex 3:6 – 13). In Ex 3:15, the name Yahweh (NIV “L ord ”) is introduced and it seems to some interpreters that God is giving a new name not previously revealed. The situation is made more confusing in Ex 6:2 – 3, where God says to Moses, “I am the L ord [Yahweh]. I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty [El- Shaddai], but by my name the L ord [Yahweh], I did not make myself fully known to them.” Verses such as these have led some to postulate that the occurrence of Yahw eh in the patriarchal narratives is simply the work of the editor of Genesis, showing the continuity between the patriarchs and later Israel. The fact that Genesis takes its final form no earlier than the time of Moses has allowed some conservative scholars to be content with viewing the references to Yahweh in the patriarchal narratives as purposeful intrusion. To them, the name of Yahweh was added in appropriate places to affirm that the patriarchs really did wor- ship the same God as the Israelites, though they called him by a different name. This may be acceptable in some cases, but it does not explain the passages in which God is presented as identifying himself as Yahweh. In Ex 3:13, Moses is not looking to fill an information gap concerning God’s iden- tity, but rather, is asking which previously known epithet is most appropriate to use. In Ex 3:15, God explains that the epithet Yahweh (NIV “L ord ”) is the appropriate one. In Ex 6:3 God explains that El-Shaddai (NIV “God Almighty”) was the epithet most appropriately connected with how God interacted with the patriarchs and what he accomplished for them. They did not experience firsthand the significance of the epithet Yahweh, which was connected to the longer-term promises of God, specifi- cally the land. In other words, it is not that the patriarchs were ignorant of the name Yahweh, but the epithet El-Shaddai was appropriate for the aspects of the covenant they experienced. The name Yahweh was one of many epithets they used to refer to their God, but it was not the primary one in their usage or understanding.  ◆