NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible NIV Biblical Theology Study Bible | Page 25

Genesis 3:6  | 29 2:19 u  Ps  8:7 v  Ge  1:24 2:22 w  1Co  11:8, ​9, ​12 2:23 x  Ge  29:14; Eph 5:28‑30 2:24 y  Mal  2:15 z  Mt 19:5*; Mk 10:7- 8*; 1Co 6:16*; Eph 5:31* 2:25 a  Ge  3:7, ​10‑11 3:1 b  2Co  11:3; Rev 12:9; 20:2 3:4 c  Jn 8:44; 2Co 11:3 3:5 d  Isa  14:14; Eze 28:2 3:6 e  Jas  1:14-15; 1Jn 2:16 19 Now the Lord God had ­formed out of the ­ground all the wild an­i­mals  u and all the ­ irds in the sky. He ­brought them to the man to see what he ­would name them; and what­ b ever the man ­called each liv­ing crea­ture,  v that was its name. 20 So the man gave ­names to all the live­stock, the ­birds in the sky and all the wild ­an­i­mals. But for Adam  a no suit­able helper was ­found. 21 So the Lord God ­caused the man to fall into a deep s ­ leep; and ­while he was sleep­ing, he took one of the ­man’s ribs  b and then c ­ losed up the ­place with f ­ lesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib  c   w he had taken out of the man, and he ­brought her to the ­man. 23 The man ­said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh;  x she shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man.” 24 That is why a man l ­ eaves his fa­ther and mother and is united  y to his wife, and they be­ come one ­flesh.  z 25 Adam and his wife were both na­ked,  a and they felt no ­shame. The Fall 3 Now the ser­pent  b was more c ­ rafty than any of the wild an­i­mals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the ­gar­den’?” 2 The woman said to the ser­pent, “We may eat ­fruit from the ­trees in the gar­den, 3 but God did say, ‘You must not eat f ­ ruit from the tree that is in the mid­dle of the gar­den, and you must not ­touch it, or you will ­die.’ ” ­ nows that 4 “You will not cer­tainly die,” the ser­pent said to the woman.  c 5 “For God k when you eat from it your eyes will be o ­ pened, and you will be like God,  d know­ing good and ­evil.” 6 When the woman saw that the ­fruit of the tree was good for food and pleas­ing to the eye, and also de­sir­able  e for gain­ing wis­dom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some a  20 Or the man    b  21 Or took part of the man’s side    c  22 Or part    2:19 – 20  God’s search for a helper involves the man’s naming the animals. The man here discerns the purpose of the animals and so calls the creatures according to their role in creation. He exercises dominion over creation in general (see notes on 1:26,28). 2:22 rib. Always means “side” where it occurs elsewhere. As always, the Lord God initiates the action and takes from the man’s side so that the woman is in every way human ( ʾ ādām; see 1:26; 2:7 and notes), just like the man. 2:23 bone of my bones. The man recognizes that the woman originates from himself. “woman” . . . man. Hebrew ʾ iššâ . . . ʾ iš. Like ʾ ādām (masculine word for humans and the man) and ʾ ădāmâ (feminine word for ground) in v. 7 that connect man with the ground (see note on v. 7), these words sound similar and connect man with woman. 2:24 why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife. The physical cre- ation of the woman by taking her from the man implies a natural relationship that is restored when the man and woman become “one flesh” by physically reuniting. 2:25 naked . . . felt no shame. The two a re in perfect harmony. There are no barriers and no shame from the absence of barriers. Ch. 2 ends with harmony between God and cre- ation, between God and the human couple, between the couple and creation, and be- tween the man and the woman (cf. 3:7). world has become the corrupted place that we know. 3:1  serpent. People in the ancient world considered snakes to be sources of long life, healing, and wisdom, but Israelites who were familiar with the food regulations of Leviticus would associate the serpent with unclean animals (Lev 11:42) and be suspicious. crafty. Hebrew ʿ ārûm. This rare Hebrew word, con- sistent with the snake’s reputation for wis- dom, sounds like the Hebrew for “naked” in 2:25 ( ʿ ămrûummîm). The wordplay suggests that the serpent’s craftiness will overturn the innocence symbolized by the couple’s naked- ness. Did God really say . . . ? God invites the man to eat from “any tree” (2:16), but the serpent denies what God says by adding the word “not.” Such lies characterize the serpent’s speech (3:4). Genesis does not ex- plicitly identify the serpent as Satan, but the NT describes the devil as “a liar and the father of lies” (John 8:44) and “that ancient serpent” (Rev 12:9; 20:2). If everything was “very good” in 1:31, then evil has now entered the world. The source of this evil is not given, but it ex- isted before Adam and Eve disobeyed God. Something was already amiss in the world. 3:2  We may eat fruit from the trees. The woman correctly qualifies the serpent’s charge, but she diminishes God’s grace by not emphasizing that they are “free” to eat from “any” tree (2:16). 3:3 the tree that is in the middle of the gar- den. She omits the name of the tree, which 3:1 – 24  The Fall. Continuing the creation ac- contains the rationale for not eating from it. count, the biblical story recounts what went you must not touch it. A statement that God wrong with the perfect harmony of ch. 2 apparently never made. The effect creates an and how sin changed everything so that the arbitrary command (God just chose any tree) and trivializes the offense in contrast to the punishment (death for touching fruit!). God originally spoke this command only to the man. Although the man is present in this exchange (v. 6), the woman speaks. How did she know what God said? We are not told whether God told her directly or whether the man passed the words along to her. The re- sult indicts both the man and the woman in this transgression. 3:4 You will not certainly die. The snake lies, again quoting God’s words (2:17) and placing a negative (“not”) in front of them (see 3:1 and note). 3:5 God knows. Satan accuses God of selfish motives (cf. Job 1:9 – 11; 2:4 – 5). your eyes will be opened . . . knowing good and evil. This seems to coincide with the tree’s purpose. The man and woman both become aware of their nakedness (v. 7). But this knowledge does not exclude the punishment that God promised. So the serpent denies the sin’s punishment but glorifies its reward. The lure is to “be like God” in a manner differ- ent from God’s intent. Ironically, the human couple have been made in the “image of God” (1:27). They are to be like God by ruling over the earth on his behalf. God has provided a way in the garden (through obedience) and will ultimately provide another way (through the sacrifice of Christ; see 2 Pet 1:4), but God’s way lacks the attractive false promise of the serpent’s seemingly easier way. 3:6 good. God created everything “good” (ch. 1). All the food in the garden was good, but the woman thought only of this food and made what God had said was not good (to eat) into something that seemed good. ­