New Church Life May/June 2016 | Page 47

Surely We Are Not Swedenborgians! The Rev. Gerald G. Waters F or some years now I and several others have felt increasingly concerned at the frequent reference in some New Church literature, whether it be sermons, Journey Programs or collateral works, to “the works or teachings of or from Emanuel Swedenborg.” In recent years the General Church has promoted the introduction and use of Journey Programs for small groups as an added and effective way to teach and evangelize the wonderful new truths the Lord has given mankind in His second coming. These programs are, I believe, most applicable to younger people and those searching for spiritual truth, which would include those non-New Church folk who are invited to join Journey groups. These people are the future of the Church and they need to understand clearly that the teachings of the New Church come from the Lord and NOT from Swedenborg. Yes, they were given through a man chosen by the Lord, Emanuel Swedenborg, just as the books of the Old and New Testaments were given through the minds of men chosen by God. Personally, I feel Swedenborg would be distraught to know that the Writings he was enlightened to write down are being referred to as his teachings. Now, perhaps I am over-reacting to references of Swedenborg in church literature and could benefit by having the views of others, and I would welcome that. So in the hopes of receiving such views, let me give you a sense of what I’m talking about by quoting from a Journey Program we, in New ChurchWestville, South Africa, are currently working on. In one section of the Journey Program dealing with the “Gift of Change” it says: “Swedenborg describes the process of positive change, or repentance as one that is essential to experiencing our full human capacity.” A little further on it says: “According to Swedenborg, repentance doesn’t mean just noticing our failures.” Then, over the page under the heading, “What does it mean ‘to shun evils as sins’?” and after the explanation of this, it concludes by saying: 249