New Church Life Jan/Feb 2014 | Seite 13

Letters to the Editors The Challenge to Protect Marriage To The Editors: The comments by the Rev. Walter E. Orthwein in his editorial, New Church Virtues: Reverence (under the subheading, Reverence for Marriage, New Church Life, page 447), are particularly pertinent to those living in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), where I reside. As I write this letter in late October, it is only a few days ago that the ACT Government passed a law to legalize same-sex marriage on the grounds that, with regard to love and choice of marriage partner, everyone is entitled to freedom of choice and equal treatment, regardless of gender.  However, the Australian (federal) Government has jurisdiction over marriage, and under federal law, marriage is defined as the union of a man with a woman.  Almost immediately, the Australian Government challenged the ACT Government in the High Court in an attempt to repeal the ACT law, arguing that it conflicts with the Federal Marriage Act and is therefore unconstitutional. Since the challenge is made purely on constitutional grounds and not on religious or moral grounds, it cannot be assumed that it was made because of any opposition to same-sex marriage. The result of the challenge was expected to be known in December. [On December 12, Heulwen Ridgway sent this update: “Today the High Court of Australia announced that it had struck down the ACT law which legalized same-sex marriage. The decision was unanimous and was made on the grounds that the ACT law conflicts with the federal Marriage Act and is therefore unconstitutional. The only way now to legalize same-sex marriage in Australia is by attempting to change the Federal Marriage Act through Federal Parliament. Meantime, the same-sex marriages that were contracted in the five-day window of opportunity before today’s announcement will be annulled.”] This outcome of the High Court challenge in the ACT has important implications for the whole of Australia and, I believe, for the New Church also.  If the Australian Government had lost the challenge, the ACT law 9