This also naturally builds status through
sustainability, without compromise. All
resources will flow to the most sustainable projects that give the best to most
people. This creates and offers a wider
range of choices, allowing for experimentation with new ideas, tastes, and experiences, all based on sustainable foundations. Is there anything this plan lacks?
I do not believe so.
5 We also reuse the need for inequality, in
all its forms, as a status driver. Is it really
useful to you to own, or lend and return
for a better model? Resources used for
demarcating become resources for
sharing. All the differences we perceive
to make a difference in belonging fall
away, becoming what we have in
common that identifies communities.
War? Racism? Land ownership? What for?
What political mechanism could exist to
warrant that, when gifting sustainable
creation is the mechanism for enriching
lives? It is impossible.
Conclusion
We always value creation, so why give it a
price? We can say that money empowers,
but what type of money? Does it need to
be quantitative, or can it be qualitative, as
simple as saying: “You’re the best!”. If you are
the only person gifting, that’s to be taken
advantage of, but if EVERYONE’S status is
measured this way, it’s a disadvantage to
not create anything, especially if education
is free and people are supporting you with
their specialties. Living life is not just about
taking, because you need to be valued, and