Tellinger proposes sounds like Google.
Creators/innovators are obsessed with
creations, so the time will never hold fast,
while working for the community may
lead to things you have no interest in.
Better to leave that stuff to people that
do, no? What people create in their own
time will be, more often than not, of value
to the community anyway, so why make
the distinction? Further, it still establishes
political rule, limiting diversified creativity.
Any exchange model must promote owning your creativity, at all times. Anything
else is a power-trip.
you are giving your creations, too, to anyone
that wants them, on demand. Highest
quality, minimal resources, shortest time.
People will gravitate to projects that achieve
that best, in interests of their choice.
The Gifting Mechanism in a Free Economy
and How to Get There
GETTING THERE is a far simpler concept
than money models will ever be. The
objective of any business is to make profit
by building a reputation for creating
value. The current mechanism to do that
is get money to create lowest quality at
highest price, and being as unsustainable
as possible. The larger you are, the better
you can do that. Why are the banks, who
create nothing, the largest industry, and
government the second biggest?
Incomprehensible.
I am not advocating to gift in good faith
alone. You are in communities that value
creation and seed themselves in knowledge, and no matter what capacity you
give, that is not just of value to the community, but it has value to you to want to
create and give it, that it is your best. I am
not presenting this in a woo-woo way,
because that doesn’t interest me. My
analysis is purely based on logic. I am happy
to leave the spirituality to others; better
yet, yourself, because how to live for joy,
not fear, is why I am doing this.
There is no governing body telling you what
is most necessary to create. It is dependent
on your locality and your needs. Of course,
different communities will be better at
creating different things, but they will be
known for how sustainably they can do that,
so why compete to do it if they are better
at it? And they are happy to give it, because
The best thing about gifting is it empowers
EVERYONE to create. It takes away political
control of developing countries, as they are
now free to build what they want for themselves, and if it has value for us, they can give
it. We can help them to get there, freely,
especially since we have taken so much
away from them.
I’ll call this community the FREE COMMUNITY (FC). This is as big and decentralised
as one would want, as it is not just one
community in one place, but many communities in different places.
1 I begin by approaching an industry
with an offer for free labour, proposing
to transform it into a sustainable
powerhouse of production: producing
only on demand, reducing costs of
production, needing the banks less,