NEO Magazine Issue 3 | Page 79

sophical internalisation but these damn words damn him as they threaten to damn us: “When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it and you argue about what to do about it only after you have had your technical success. That is the way it was with the atom bomb.” Oppenheimer explained a “few people cried, few people laughed, most being silent” on witnessing the trinity explosion.26 “How much better is it to weep at joy than to joy at weeping” ~ William Shakespeare and friends, perceived enemies, nations with their walls of enmity and boundaries of hate, inspired thoughts of past, present and future states, in our defining natural environment, and the very condition the ecology of a human Self- soul- self- brain-mind, and consciousness, gone in a ‘blazing instant’. We have cut, split, divided, severed, sheared, separated, defined, detailed, and detonated our way to the atom, and then, assailed that too. America, using the information with all the care of a spoilt adolescent. Like showing a child how to strike a match then leaving the box within easy reach: I’ll go ahead and stick this beautifully crafted sword in your heart and well let’s see Bill, what just might happen. Oh Yes “let’s kill Bill” and Jeb? “Jeb’s dead baby, Jeb’s dead.” A~ “We know how to do this people” States of self consciousness of intergrading quality, bound in cause and effect, have created a device, Hydrogen bomb,27 so monstrous that if unleashed, its thermonuclear fires would draw all things morphologically animate and civilisations inanimate shaping, and the possibility of defining thingishness in variable ways, to an ignominious end. The end of human self consciousness and its manifestations, purling laughter, tears of sorrow and of joy, family A~ “Unfortunate times son, unfortunate so “shoot, let’s use these suckers on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, yep, let these babies blow.” B~ “That’s unfortunate phrasing sir.” times.” B~ “Excuse me sir, do we have a name for the consequences.” A~ “Consequences son... consequences!?” B~ “Is it not genocide sir?” A~ “Collateral damage son, collateral damage.” B~ “That’s more than one word Sir.” A~ “We have more than one enemy son.” http://sites.utexas.edu/joshhamptonincyberspace/files/2015/09/ Ethics-of-artificial-intelligence-1.pdf 22 http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Begin/Einstein.shtml 23 http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/archives/pdfs/docsworldwar.pdf 24 https://amphilsoc.org/sites/default/files/proceedings/Hijiya.pdf 25 that which “upholds” the universe 26 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb13ynu3Iac 27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjnm3V0xYjI 21