NEO Magazine Issue 3 | Page 111

action. This is the crucial aspect of law that nearly every government on Earth has failed to address. Because implied consent is an assumption of agreement, a presumption that those affected know the Truth, it is always a breach of Trust. In order for a Trust to be established, action to fully disclose the Truth to all affected parties must take place, and if this is not done, any action taken under such circumstances is dishonorable. Governments the world over employ tacit or implied consent to rule the people. This is known as a de facto government, which gains consent by acquiescence or the inaction of the people to “stand up and say otherwise.” It is the duty of government in due diligence to ensure that all those affected by its policies and procedures have freely exercised their will to choose, to agree or to disagree. The Dishonor and Breach of Trust by “Governments” and The “Justice System” In order to understand why a body founded in Natural Justice is superior to any of the present “justice systems” on Earth, we must understand why and how governments have breached the public Trust. A legitimate government gains explicit consent by the people to operate honorably. This reality is reflected in the Declaration of Independence: Given the definition of honor above, governments are required to establish a public Trust, based on full disclosure and explicit consent of all beings who are affected. However, on Earth there are no such systems of explicit consent; as such, it is necessary that a venue be provided by which individuals may voice concerns, by which airing of grievances may take place, in order to facilitate negotiation between all involved so that any and all actions taken by the collective do not harm even one individual. A government can be considered to be legitimate and honorable if it acknowledges Natural Law, and the ITNJ seeks to begin this process of establishing a true form of Justice. Using this objective definition, derived from the causal consequences of Natural Law, there are no legitimate systems of justice on Earth. Instead, the “justice system” presumes your acceptance of their codes of conduct (Statutes) and ignores grievances to “keep the peace”. Democracy is a system of government wherein a majority can agree to over rule a minority, even when harm occurs, and is therefore dishonorable and immoral. This is essentially what the justice system has done, and presumes that there is no Natural Law which it is beholden to. This is known as moral relativism or solipsism, and is a choice to ignore a fundamental aspect of reality itself. (There is a significant difference between nescience, or a lack of awareness of an aspect of reality, and ignorance, or the act of ignoring an aspect of reality that we know to exist in point of fact.) "...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Since the vast majority of people who are powers from the consent of the governed" influenced by the actions of government do