It is the duty of each individual to fully disclose their knowledge about a thing, as a
result of their awareness concerning such
a thing. Failure to disclose this knowledge
creates a moral culpability, and indicates
that harm has been caused on the part of
the non-disclosing party. In other words, the
individual who knows the Truth, and chooses
not to share it, harms another by attempting to manipulate the other's awareness and,
as a result, their ability to freely choose. Any
time one being seeks to abrogate the free
will of another, violence and injury have been
exacted. In contrast, when one seeks to stop
another from acting out of violence by use of
force, this is an honorable action, so long as
measures have been taken in due diligence
to educate the individual acting in violence.
Such harm, or breach of Trust, is what systems of justice are attempting to address.
When injustice or harm is observed by
anyone, he or she has a moral duty to share
the Truth, and to take actions to ensure that
all who are affected by said injustice are duly
notified so that their grievances(s) may be
addressed.
Equity or Contract Law A Consequence of Trust
In Trust Law and by extension Equity or
“Contract” Law, sharing the Truth one has
gained in relation to a thing is described
as full disclosure and transparency. If one
being takes action, and said action affects
another, were the terms and potential
effects of said action disclosed in their
entirety in order to ensure that the other
freely chose to be so effected? If one being
notifies another of their intent to do something, was this notice acknowledged by
another in due diligence in order to ensure
that the other did in fact acknowledge it
and agree to it within their conscious
awareness?