NEO Magazine Issue 1 | Page 40

The Judges at Nuremberg were on trial for their failure to uphold the Rule of Law, and for making a mockery of Justice. This movie presents a simple solution that only requires a Tribunal. We do not need to seat Grand Juries to start holding the current crop of Agents, Judges, and others impersonating Government officials accountable when they fail to follow their own rules. Understanding how the Courts break their own rules is the first step. What Jurisdiction do the Court’s claim as their authority? What Ru les of the Court are the Judges following? Under Article III of the Constitution, the judicial power operates under a very tight leash. Criminal cases require a Jury Trial. Judges elected or appointed to the Bench have to meet stringent requirements in order to receive compensation. Judges acting under Article III courts have sworn an oath to protect the Due Process rights of the people. Administrative Agencies, and this includes those acting in a Judicial capacity under Title 28-Judiciary, are restricted to CIVIL MATTERS. They have no authority under CRIMINAL JURISDICTION. According to their own rules, under Title 28, Criminal Matters are RESERVED FOR FUTURE CODIFICATION. Judges have no authority under the Constitution, the United States Codes or the Code of Federal Regulations to hear a criminal matter. Criminal charges require a Jury Trial, an injured party, and proof that a serious crime has been committed. In light of that information, take a moment to register a fact that can’t be disputed: In courts all across America, a Traffic Ticket is prosecuted as a CRIMINAL CHARGE. DUI’s are Criminal Charges. Child Support Enforcement is a Criminal Charge. A Bank foreclosing on a homeowner is a Criminal Charge. A parent who can’t pay child support is indicted under criminal charges and sentenced to DEBTOR’S PRISON, a clear violation of Due Process under the Constitution. Debtor’s Prison was outlawed when this country was founded. The Supreme Court overturned a Georgia case in 1984 when a man was sentenced to Debtor’s Prison. By what Authority can a Judge presume to get away with such blatant disregard for the Constitution?