Municipal Monitor Q3 2017 | Page 41

are going to get value from this, we would like to see some reflection of that.” Andrew Nicklin, technology and open government strat- egist at Johns Hopkins University Center for Government Excellence, in Baltimore, says that revenue from data col- lection might be necessary for governments to sustain and improve their open data strategies. “Open data programs can be operated at very low costs compared to other government services, but the cost is never zero. Setting up public data programs with payment components may be just one of several ways to ensure sus- “ If a developer creates a highly successful business based on free government data, governments could negotiate a percentage of the profits. ” tainability, especially in times of austerity,” Nicklin wrote recently on medium.com. “The case can be made that charging for the data will also force quality and documen- tation to significantly improve as well.” In short, developers will get better data, and more of it, if it is funded. As the open data ecosystem grows, municipal govern- ments are discovering increasing costs to meet demands, says Robert Giggey, program manager of web services at the City of Ottawa. “Offering data is a good business ser- vice. But to the level that some are looking for it, systems can’t always cope. It’s one thing to have some spreadsheets up online that are occasionally downloaded. But when you have an API (application program interface) that is contin- ually being hit — if Google integrates something and you are getting hundreds or thousands of users and it’s eating your systems — you have to buy a new server.” Giggey says some municipalities in their open data infancy are balking at the costs. “I agree with a lot of what Andrew Nicklin is saying. It’s not one or the other. The two can co-exist. Now it is figuring out what that means.” Giggey says one option is a quid-pro-quo system, such as allowing car-sharing companies to set up in your city in exchange for the data they collect. Longo agrees. Car-sharing companies like Car2Go, for instance, have transponders showing where their vehicles are picked up, how they are being used and minute details like how much gas is in the tank. “Knowing who is going where and when is a really powerful tool to help revolutionize how you plan a city,” Longo said. One oft-cited example of a profitable business model built on free government data is TV weather channels and private weather websites. “They are entirely based on free public data,” Longo said. “They are adding a lot of value, there’s no doubt there, but at what point are they taking advantage of a lot of work that is available from govern- ment open data?” Longo says he is sympathetic to independent devel- opers who say they need free open data to innovate and create. “But if there’s no business there because you have to pay for something, then there’s no business. I think the argument for cities is that ‘We can’t continue to do this in a quality way if we have no way to make sense of it.’ I would have trouble as a politician saying ‘we will provide open data’ without asking ‘how are we going to make it sustainable?’ I would think developers eventually will come around to the point that if the quality is improved because there’s more revenue funding it, then that’s a good thing.”  Our Municipal Group L to R: Gregory Sills, Stephen D’Agostino, David Germain, Al Burton, Denitza Koev, Jeff Wilker CALL THE LAND MINDS Thomson, Rogers is a leader in Municipal, Expropriation and Planning Law. Our dedicated team of lawyers is known for accepting the most difficult and challenging cases. Put the land minds at Thomson, Rogers to work for you . MUNICIPAL LAWYERS TF: 1.888.223.0448 T: 416.868.3100 www.thomsonrogers.com Municipal Monitor 39