MOSAIC Fall 2014 | Page 11

more to aid our culture and our Church than the “theology of women” recently called for by some Church leaders. Relying on the indications left for us by St. John Paul, we will ourselves return to the “beginning” found in Genesis and continue the work he began there. What Are the Fundamentals? St. John Paul’s theory of complementarity can be contrasted with the many distortions that are found in history and still characterize our own era. First there was Plato, who argued that women and men are equal but denied any real differences. Next was the gender “polarity” of Aristotle, where men are considered superior to women. Later there came “fractional” complementarity, a theory that suggests that a man and a woman “add up” as it were to one whole human being. But most destructive are the theories of dualism and materialism. These ideas fracture the union of the body and the soul; the body is merely “matter” and human identity is located in “mind” alone. Such thinking has turned the body into an instrument of pleasure, one’s sexual identity as a matter of choice, and led to the conviction that men and women are exactly the same and the body has no meaning at all. The