The energetic structure of the human being has been examined by for example Professor Dr . Valerie V . Hunt , as well as Dr . Motoyama . However their research , especially that of Hunt ( 1995 ), focuses more on the general health of the human being , although it also contains certain findings which may prove useful in an HR context , whereas the research conducted by Motoyama ( 1978 ) was to show the possibility of making predictions about a person based on that persons energetic structure . maximum , yet as the authors of this article do not believe in the “ one size fits all ” -philosophy, especially not in Human Resource Management ( or in any other domain dealing with human beings ), we consider it an important , and necessary , step for the evolution of the field , to begin by clarifying the energetic fluctuations of different employees during a workday .
Methodology
As Torp et al . ( 2014a ; 2014b ; 2015a , 2015b , 2016 ) have examined in previous studies it seems that there exists an objective and quantitative way to assess a human being based on measuring that person ’ s electromagnetic field .
This is based on Einstein ’ s famous equation , E = MC2 ; in other words , that everything in this universe consists of energy . According to Quantum Physics four forces govern this energy : Gravity , Electromagnetism , The Strong Nuclear Attraction , as well as The Weak Nuclear Attraction .
The study design
This study is based on the empirical data collected at two different large multinational companies ; from now on referred to as company A and company B . Both these companies are , by coincidence , in the transportation industry , yet all the participants have office functions , some in HR , some in accounting , this for company A . In company B all the participants work with administrative tasks regarding the services the company offers .
In company B 7 employees were measured ; this constitutes the entire staff of their Romanian office . In company A a total of 28 employees were measured , which constitutes a small part of one of their Romanian departments , which at the present moment has around 200 employees .
In both companies each employee was ( attempted ) measured 5 times during a workday ; once before the start of the work in the morning at 9.00 , and then with two hour intervals until the final measurement at around 17.00 .
As Stephen Hawking writes that “ Electromagnetic forces are responsible for all of chemistry and biology .” ( Hawking , 2010 , 133 ), it seems plausible that it should be possible – with sufficiently advanced measuring equipment – to make objective and quantitative assessments of a human being , based on that person ’ s electromagnetic field . Furthermore , as Professor Dr . William A . Tiller states that there is a connection between a persons functioning , and that person ’ s electromagnetic field , then these measurements should be able to predict for example skills , competences , qualities , behaviour , and even professional performance . In other words , such measurements may help in predicting the top performer , and , which is possibly even more important , such measurement may also be used in order to help people to develop and to gain more energy .
In company B every person was measured thus five times during a day , this was possible – perhaps - because company B is smaller and there were no secondary tasks scheduled for that day .
In company A several of the people measured were not able to attend some of the measurements during the day , due to meetings , training , etc . Thus the graphs for this company are based on the first and the last measurements as the large majority participated in those measurements .
In order to ensure as high reliability as possible the project had been presented to the invited participants in the days before , where most of the participants had been measured in order to remove any anxiety regarding that experience , which possibly could influence the outcome of the measurements .
Monad 3 / 2016 | Page 13