MIREALTOR® Online June 2014 | Page 20

Instead of having a loss that saves tax, Ben now has to pay tax. In order to calculate his net benefits, Ben adds his cash flow plus principal reduction, then subtracts the tax he has to pay. If he divides these current net benefits by his original $10,000 investment, the rate of return might still look good. But here’s the key point: Ben’s investment is not the amount he originally invested sixteen years ago. Instead, his investment is the amount he could get out of the property if he disposed of it today. For the sake of this example, assume Ben’s loan has been paid down significantly over the years and the property has increased in value. Let’s say he could sell the rental property today and walk out of the closing with net proceeds of $80,000. If that’s the case, Ben doesn’t have $10,000 invested, he has $80,000 invested. If he divides his current net benefits by $80,000 his return on equity is probably very low. As equity grows, return on equity usually falls. Ben should ask himself, “Could my $80,000 equity do better if it was invested in a different property?” If the answer is “yes,” he should move his equity. The best way to move equity is by doing a 1031 exchange. Exchanging allows investors to move their net equity from one property to another without paying tax. MIREALTOR® | JUNE 2014 20 Therefore, if Ben wants to retain his membership in the “investment genius” club, he’ll exchange the equity into a different property – or properties – and re-boot his rate of return. A successful investor’s goal is to main Z[