Mining Mirror March 2019 | Page 21

Mining in focus A 2006 tailings dam model. there is now a new requirement for both undrained and effective stress analyses — also considering real-time modelling of behaviour of the tailings facilities. Increasingly detailed investigations and testing — from both the field and in laboratories — are required, to better understand tailings dam material property behaviour. The testing results are then used to model, including seepage behaviour, consolidation behaviour, compressibility behaviour, shear strength behaviour (static and dynamic conditions), static liquefaction behaviour, and tailings deformation behaviour under seismic conditions. Many appropriate developments and advances in modelling software are currently being made as computing power becomes increasingly more affordable; for example, fully coupled seepage, consolidation and (static and dynamic) stress modelling is now possible. A step change in these engineering tools should become more user-friendly and affordable within the next decade. Waste management critical Water management on and off the facilities is also becoming more critical. At many mines, there is a requirement to co-dispose of mining waste streams — sometimes from the process plants and sometimes from mining and plants. This can lead to complex residue www.miningmirror.co.za Many design innovations are required to provide safe storage facilities, considering waste stream material incompatibilities from a material behavioural point of view. storage design, and no single solution fits all construction and operating requirements. Many design innovations are required to provide safe storage facilities, considering waste stream material incompatibilities from a material behavioural point of view. However, many site-specific innovations have been achieved by SRK. We have also been able to assist clients in reducing costs by additional optimisations. The use of HDPE-type liners as barrier systems has a major effect on the stability behaviour of tailings dams, as above and below liner drainage systems have to be provided, and the design criteria for both cases are still in a process of development and evolution. The design of monitoring systems is likely to undergo considerable development — in the past, the practice was to provide for instrumentation such as stand pipe piezometers and drain flows, which could be read on a weekly or monthly basis. A recent development is to install instrumentation that can be read on a real-time basis — and making use of satellite technologies will become common within the next decade. Considering the mining sector’s heightened concern with safety regarding TSFs — and the potential for technology to gather and analyse ever-larger quantities of real-time data — the scope for engineering even safer tailings dam solutions is within our grasp. It is exciting to know that the questions that mines are now asking about TSFs can and will be answered. MARCH 2019 MINING MIRROR [21]