Military Review English Edition November-December 2015 | Page 69

AIR DEFENSE
21. FM 3-01, U.S. Army Air and Missile Defense Operations, 5-1.
22. Shirley Dismuke, “The 2013 State of Fires,” Fires: Fires
2020 ( July–August 2013): 14.
23. Wes Dohogn, “Airspace Management with SHORAD
Integration,” 120.
24. Ibid., 117.
25. John M. McHugh and Raymond T. Odierno, U.S Army
Posture Statement 2015, submitted to the Committees and Subcommittees of the United States Senate and the United States House of
Representatives, March 2015, 25, accessed 4 August 2015, http://
usarmy.vo.llnWd.net/e2/rv5_downloads/aps/aps_2015.pdf.
26. Boeing Defense, Space, & Security, “Backgrounder:
Avenger Derivatives,” June 2013, accessed 31 August 2015,
http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/
avenger/docs/Avenger_overview.pdf.
27. Ibid.
28. “Accelerated Improved Interceptor Initiative (AI3),”
Raytheon Company website, accessed 17 July 2015, http://
www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/ai3/.
29. News Release, “US Army, Raytheon Achieve First
Inflight Lethal Intercept of Low Quadrant Elevation Rocket,” Raytheon Company website, 19 August 2013, accessed 17 July 2015, http://investor.raytheon.com/phoenix.
zhtml?c=84193&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1848385&highlight=.
30. Program Executive Office Missiles and Space, “IFPC Inc
2-I” (Public Release Capability Briefing, Redstone Arsenal, AL,
2013), 1–6, accessed 17 July 2015, http://www.msl.army.mil/
Documents/Briefings/CMDS/CMDS%20Public%20Release%20
Brief_27%20Aug%202013_IFPC%20Inc%202-I.pdf.
31. Ibid. Program Executive Office Missiles and Space
released an additional overview brief of the IFPC Increment
2–Intercept Block 1 program on 1 April 2014, accessed 17 July
2015, http://www.msl.army.mil/Documents/Briefings/CMDS/
CMDS%20SS%20198%20IFPC%20Inc%202-I%20Product%20
Overview_25%20Mar%2014.pdf. See also Aviation and
Missile Research Development Engineering Center (AMRDEC),
“Multi-mission launcher preliminary design review successful,”

www.army.mil, 16 July 2015, accessed 31 August 2015, http://
www.army.mil/article/152399/Multi_Mission_Launcher_Preliminary_Design_Review_successful/?from=RSS.
32. Winston M. Marbella and Benjamin Quesada, “A
Maneuver Air and Missile Defense Battery Adapts to Ground
Combat in Iraq: Tropic Lightning Air Defenders Learn to Fight,
Survive and Win in the Contemporary Operational Environment,” Air Defense Artillery (April–June 2005): 32.
33. U.S. Army Capabilities Integration Center, Force 2025
Maneuvers, White Paper (23 January 2014), 2, accessed 17 July
2015, http://www.arcic.army.mil/app_Documents/USArmy_
WhitePaper_Force-2025-Maneuvers_23JAN2014.pdf.
34. “Medium Tactical Vehicles,” Oshkosh Defense LLC
website, accessed 17 July 2015, http://oshkoshdefense.com/
products/medium-tactical-vehicles/.
35. FM 3-90.6, Brigade Combat Team, 1-10; “Mine
Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP),” Oshkosh Defense LLC
website, accessed 17 July 2015, http://oshkoshdefense.com/
products/mine-resistant-ambush-protected-mrap/.
36. “Stryker Family of Vehicles,” Program Executive Office
Ground Combat Systems website, accessed 17 July 2015, http://
www.peogcs.army.mil/documents/FMS-Stryker.pdf.
37. Robert W. Cone, “Shaping the Army of 2020,” Army,
October 2011, 72, accessed 17 July 2015, http://www.ausa.
org/publications/armymagazine/archive/2011/10/documents/
cone_1011.pdf.
38. Nick Simeone, “Hagel Outlines Budget Reducing Troop
Strength, Force Structure,” Department of Defense News
website, 24 February 2014, accessed 17 July 2015, http://www.
defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121703.
39. U.S. Army Capabilities Integration Center, Army Vision—Force 2025, White Paper (23 January 2014), 2, accessed
27 August 2015, http://www.arcic.army.mil/app_Documents/
USArmy_WhitePaper_Army-Vision-Force-2025_23JAN2014.
pdf.
40. Vergun, “Air, Missile Defense Effectiveness.”

Military Review is seeking volunteer book review authors to
join its group of distinguished book reviewers.
The purpose of “MR Book Reviews” is to inform our readers of the publication of books
of professional interest. A review briefly tells what a book is about and provides a concise
evaluation of the book by a qualified observer. Military Review provides a listing of the
books available for review. Reviews are between 450 and 500 words.
Those interested in joining Military Review’s group of book review authors are invited to read the MR
Book Reviewer Submission Guide online at http://usacac.army.mil/CAC2/MilitaryReview/resources/
book-reviews.asp. Then email a copy of your curriculum vitae, along with a message indicating your
specific areas of interest, to [e-mail].

MILITARY REVIEW  November-December 2015

63