Military Review English Edition July-August 2016 | Page 69
CBRNE
Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington
I CORPS
Pacific
Command
3
110
Yakima Training Center,
Washington
9
TE
11
TE
707
45
787
Task Force 52
(CBRNE)
Task Force 71
53
Fort Carson, Colorado
Task Force 48
749
Fort Riley, Kansas
62
764
630
10
759
774
CCE
21
46
TE
741
79
68
704
TE
752
181
CBRNE
71st OD (EOD) Group
52nd OD (EOD) Group
48th Chemical Brigade
CARA
KEYS
EOD—Explosive Ordnance Disposal
Chemical Corps
CCE—CBRNE Coordination Element
Aberdeen Proving Ground,
Maryland
Fort Belvoir,
Virginia
CCE
CMU
U.S. ARMY
1 AML
55
Fort Bragg,
North Carolina
CARA
(West)
X
48
192
XVIII CORPS
Global Response Force
Fort Benning,
Georgia
789
705
Fort Polk,
Louisiana
III CORPS
20th CBRNE
CBRNE
52
CCE
797
++
20
Redstone Arsenal,
Alabama
Fort Bliss,
Texas
Fort Hood,
Texas
2
723
CONTINENTAL
U.S. SUPPORT
22
734
49
59
754
Fort Leonard Wood,
Missouri
761
44
744
CARA
Fort Sill, 763
Oklahoma
71
717
63
172
Kirtland Air Force Base,
New Mexico
760
184
(CBRNE)
242
Fort Irwin, California
Fort Drum, New York
Fort Campbell, Kentucky
(CBRNE)
Central Command, Africa
Command, & European
Command
722
18
767
28
AIRBORNE
21
Fort Stewart,
Georgia
83
25
51
TE
38
756
92
AML—Area Medical Lab
CARA—CBRNE Analytical & Remediation Activity
CBRNE—Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives
CCE—CBRNE Coordination Element
CMU—Consequence Management Unit
TE—Technical Escort
OD—Ordnance Disposal
(Graphic by Col. F. John Burpo, U.S. Army)
Figure 2. CBRNE Brigade Task Force Regional Alignment:
Unity of Command and Unity of Effort
Reorganizing CBRNE Task Forces for
Improved Efficiency
We offer that to operate effectively across the
CBRNE spectrum, the Army must broaden the historically limiting view of the 20th CBRNE Command as
focused only on CWMD and counter-IED operations. It
must be available for employment across the full range of
CBRNE threats and hazards and across the full range of
military operations. Rather than viewing the operational
environment through a narrow CWMD lens, analyzing
problems through a wider CBRNE perspective better
illuminates challenges and opportunities, and it leverages
the full capa bility of the command.
For example, recent deployment of the 20th
CBRNE Command’s area medical lab in support of
Operation United Assistance, the response to the Ebola
MILITARY REVIEW July-August 2016
crises in West Africa, illustrates an example of CBRNE
force employment that would have been precluded
based on a strictly WMD employment mindset.
We propose that to meet similar future challenges
emerging from the rapidly changing strategic environment, as well as the intent of the Quadrennial Defense
Review and the directives of the Army Strategic Planning
Guidance, by task-organizing the functionally organized
command into three multifunctional CBRNE brigade
TFs.12 Each TF would be enabled with robust CBRNE
planning and coordinating expertise and technical
reach-back capabilities provided by an aligned CBRNE
coordination element (see figure 1).
Establishing unity of command, defining clear objectives, and employing maneuver to capitalize on the
flexible application of power are battle proven remedies
67