Medical Chronicle May 2017 | Page 53

CLINICAL RESPIRATORY CPD maxillary sinusitis. Overall safety and a very low incidence of side effects have been confirmed. TOXICOLOGY, ADVERSE EFFECTS, PRECAUTIONS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, INTERACTIONS The cytotoxicity of coumarins present in the crude drug and/or extracts can be considered negligible (Kayser, 1997; Kolodziej et al, 1997; Kolodziej, 2002). To date, there are no contraindications or known drug interactions with the root extract (EPs 7630). Schulz (2008) and Conrad et al (2007) summarised efficacy and safety-related findings for Eps 7630. Controlled clinical trials all demonstrated that EPs 7630 is well- tolerated and safe. In studies with over 7000 adults and children suffering from acute bronchitis, acute tonsillo- pharyngitis, or acute maxillary sinusitis, adverse events occurred in 1%-15% of subjects. These events have been reported as largely mild, consisting of gastrointestinal complaints and skin rashes. With regards to a potential risk related to the coumarin content, a NOEL value of more than 750mg/ kg body weight was established in toxicological studies in dogs and rats. A daily intake of 60mg (3°ø30 drops) of extract would be equivalent to 4 and 1mg/kg bodyweight (15 kg for a child or 60kg for an adult, respectively) translating into a safety factor of more than 100. No hepatotoxic activity could be established for 7-hydroxycoumarin derivatives (the only coumarins present in EPs 7630) (Loew and Koch, 2008). A theoretical risk of interactions with anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs could not be confirmed as the coumarins so far identified in EPs 7630 do not appear to possess anticoagulant characteristics. Koch and Biber (2007) administered EPs 7630 to rats and observed changes in coagulation parameters and interactions with anti-coagulants of the coumarin type (warfarin). After two weeks of oral application of EPs 7630, no impact on coagulation parameters was observed. Treatment with warfarin, however, resulted in a significant lowering of coagu lation parameters. Cotreatment with EPs 7630 and warfarin did not show any effect of EPs 7630 over the efficacy of warfarin, neither did it influence the pharmacokinetics of warfarin. A total of 34 case reports of allergic (hypersensitivity) reactions have been recorded through the World Health Organization (WHO) international pharmacovigilance programme, which may be associated with the use of Pelargonium extract (De Boer et al, 2007). The extract of Pelargonium sidoides root (EPs 7630) is contraindicated during pregnancy and lactation as no specific data on its effect on pregnant or lactating women is available. Treatment of infections of the upper respiratory tract, particularly tonsillitis, often requires administration of antibiotics. Roots et al (2004) investigated a potential interaction of a EPs 7630 with penicillin V in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with 28 healthy humans. EPs 7630 and penicillin V were administered for 7 and 8 days, respectively. None of the target parameters showed any statistically significant difference between verum and placebo. Adverse reactions linked to the herbal extract were not recorded. Schulz (2008) and Conrad et al (2007) found that controlled clinical trials all demonstrated that Pelargonium root extract is well- tolerated and safe. In studies with over 7000 adults and children suffering from acute bronchitis, acute tonsillo- pharyngitis, or acute maxillary sinusitis, adverse events occurred in 1%-15% of subjects. These events have been reported as largely mild, consisting of gastrointestinal complaints and skin rashes. A total of 34 case reports of allergic (hypersensitivity) reactions have been recorded through the World Health Organization (WHO) international pharmacovigilance programme, which may be associated with the use of Pelargonium extract, all originating from Germany (De Boer et al, 2007) CONCLUSION The traditional uses of the roots of Pelargonium myrrhifolium as tonic and treatment for tuberculosis, as recorded by Burman in 1759 (Scott and Hewett, 2008) is particularly noteworthy. The underground parts of Pelargonium sidoides are known to contain a wealth of highly oxygenated coumarins and numerous other phenolic and polyphenolic compounds. The study of Kolodziej (2007), excellent and detailed as it may be, was based on single samples of Pelargonium sidoides and Pelargonium reniforme, so that possible geographical, phenotypical and genotypical patterns remain as a challenge for future research. It may also be interesting to extend the study of coumarins and coumarin derivates to other red-rooted species of Pelargonium with a recorded history of ethnomedicinal use. It is likely that the efficacy in treating respiratory ailments is due to the activities and interactions of several components rather than that of a single main constituent. EPs 7630, a root extract of Pelargonium sidoides, showed in vitro antibacterial, antiviral, and immunomodulatory properties in several studies. These activities seem to account for its therapeutic effect in patients suffering from acute bronchitis, tonsillopharyngitis, sinusitis and symptoms of the common cold. Efficacy has been proved in numerous clinical trials. The demonstrated pharmacological activities including moderate direct antibacterial potencies and notable immunomodulatory capabilities provide strong evidence for the efficacy of EPss 7630 in the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Conspicuously, infected cells showed augmented activation of host defence mechanisms. This apparent selectivity in the immune response, in contrast to random macrophage activation, may be of special benefit, reflecting effective immunoregulatory activity in infectious conditions, e.g., when needed. Since respiratory tract infections are frequently caused by viruses, the modulatory potential of this herbal medicine on the IFN system that may contribute to an improved antiviral protection deserves to be explicitly mentioned. Owing to known antiviral potencies of tannins, a closer look onto polyphenols present in this herbal medicine for this particular biological activity may also be worthwhile. Despite considerable efforts, the remedial effects cannot yet be related to a chemically defined principle. Further studies are needed towards a better understanding of the mode of actions and the responsible underlying biological principles. One study compared an extract of P. sidoides, Eps 7630, against conventional non-antibiotic treatment (acetylcysteine); the other five studies tested Eps 7630 against placebo. All RCTs reported findings suggesting the effectiveness of P. sidoides in treating acute bronchitis. Meta-analysis of the four placebo- controlled RCTs suggested that Eps 7630 significantly reduced bronchitis symptom scores in patients with acute bronchitis by day 7. No serious adverse events were reported. There is encouraging evidence from currently available data that P. sidoides is effective compared to placebo for patients with acute bronchitis. PELARGONIUM SIDOIDES AND THE COMMON COLD The common cold is a viral infection with symptoms such as sneezing, sore throat, and running nose. It is one of the most prevalent illnesses in the world, and although commonly caused by rhinoviruses, antibiotics are often prescribed unnecessarily. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to evaluate alternative treatments such as herbal medications, whose efficacy and safety is proven by pharmacological and clinical studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a liquid herbal drug preparation from the roots of Pelargonium sidoides compared with placebo in adult patients with the common cold. Design: The study was designed as a multicentre, prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial with an adaptive group-sequential design. Setting: The study took place in eight outpatient departments affiliated with hospitals. Patients: One hundred three male and female adult patients with at least two major and one minor or with one major and three minor cold symptoms (maximum symptom scor e of 40 points), present for 24 to 48 hours, and who gave provision of informed consent were randomised to receive either 30 drops (1.5mL) of the liquid herbal drug preparation EPs or placebo three times a day. Intervention: Patients received randomised treatment for a maximum period of 10 days. Measurements: The primary outcome criterion was the sum of symptom intensity differences (SSID) of the cold intensity score (CIS) from day one to day five. The CIS consists of the following 10 cold symptoms: nasal drainage, sore throat, nasal congestion, sneezing, scratchy throat, hoarseness, cough, headache, muscle aches, and fever. Results: From baseline to day five, the mean SSID improved by 14.6 +- 5.3 points in the EPs group compared with 7.6 +- 7.5 points in the placebo group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). The mean CIS decreased by 10.4 +- 3.0 points and 5.6 +- 4.3 points in EPs and placebo-treated patients, respectively. After 10 days, 78.8% versus 31.4% in the EPs vs. placebo group were clinically cured (CIS equals zero points or complete resolution of all but a maximum of one cold symptom; P <0.0001). The mean duration of inability to work was significantly lower in the EPs treatment group (6.9+-1.8 days) than in the placebo group (8.2 +- 2.1 days; P = 0.0003). Treatment outcome (rates of complete recovery or major improvement from disease [integrative medicine outcomes scale]) was assessed better in the EPs treatment group than in the placebo group by both the investigator and the patient on day five (P <0.0001). Adverse events occurred in three of 103 patients (2.9%), with two of 52 (3.8%) and one of 51 (2.0%) patients in the EPs and placebo group, respectively. All adverse events were assessed as nonserious. At the end of treatment, all patients (100%) in the active treatment group judged the subjective tolerability of Eps as good or very good. Conclusions: EPs represents an effective treatment of the common cold. It significantly reduces the severity of symptoms and shortens the duration of the common cold compared with placebo. The herbal drug is well tolerated. CPD questionnaire on pg 58. Complete online: www.medicalchronicle.co.za/medicinal-use-of-pelargonium-sidoides/ MEDICAL CHRONICLE | MAY 2017 53