MDA JAN-FEB 2019 JAN-FEB 2019 | Page 32

GHM edia B usiness Article Machine safety in the age of digitisation- Schmersal Digitisation in industrial production imposes new requirements on machine safety. It also lays the foundations for new solutions. This article looks at the effects of Industry 4.0 on functional machine safety. Keywords: machine safety, digitisation, internet of things, platform economy, Industry 4.0. The Schmersal Group develops and produces some 25,000 switchgear units, making it one of the largest providers anywhere in the world. Motivated by a vision of a safe world of work, the company’s development engineers are constantly working on new devices and systems for all conceivable application situations. Development focuses on three areas — lift technology, automation technology and safety technology — and has produced a range of mechanical and non-contact switchgear devices, a portfolio of safety switchgear and safety switching systems for protection of man and machine. Digitisation, the internet of things, platform economy, Industry 4.0. Behind all of these buzzwords is a real ‘mega trend’ that is sweeping through industry. Virtually every company has been touched by this mega trend, and we’re likely to see significant changes in every stage of industrial production as a result. This also affects machine safety, and in a multitude of ways. In the first instance, new machines and production concepts impact the design of safety systems. If components are manufactured in highly-automated one-size production batches, machines need to offer much greater flexibility, as too must the safety equipment. The most striking example of this are collaborating robots, which operate alongside workers without safety fences to separate them. Secondly, the unbroken networked communication systems of Production 4.0 offer new opportunities for machine safety. Infrastructure like the cloud and edge computing and, at product level, virtual machine and system twins, help to enhance the transparency and flexibility of safety equipment. We will outline some examples of both trends below. Increasing productivity as a goal It is a principle that machine safety should not be allowed to impair the productivity of a machine. This is far from a new requirement, but in the age of Industry 4.0, it has become far more pressing. In response to this, increasing numbers of machine builders are seeking cooperation from machine safety experts early on in the design of new series, with the aim of integrating safety functions into machine functions in such a way that productivity is maximised alongside high levels of safety. New tools such as multi-discipline Systems Engineering are available to assist with this challenge. When it comes to 32 | january-february 2019 | Global MDA machine safety, qualified services are available and offered by Schmersal under the tec.nicum brand. Services include design support, encompassing machine safety aspects and customer-specific programming of safety control units. Both help to ensure that safety functions can be integrated into or coordinated with operational machine functions as seamlessly as possible, so as not to impair productivity. Systems and solutions for machine safety In today’s world, machine builders can benefit greatly by procuring safety systems from a single source. As a systems and solutions provider for machine safety, Schmersal offers safety components and systems for signal evaluation alongside consultancy, project planning and engineering services. In view of the increasing complexity of machines, machine control units and safety systems, it is vital that we offer complete solutions packages. Individual components such as RFID-based security sensors have already been developed, like the RSS260, which can also transmit diagnostics information such as error messages, e.g. ‘Fault or short circuit at a safety output’ or ‘Faulty actuator’, to enable rapid elimination of errors. In addition, these advanced diagnostics functions also enable predictive maintenance and the avoidance of machine downtime by transmitting non-safety-related status information to operating control units, such as a notification to adjust the safety door in the event of a door offset. The extended features of these RFID sensors, such as the RSS260, also include individual encoding for enhanced manipulation protection. Data exchange beyond the machine Things become even more complex when you go beyond component level to control unit level. The goal here is to Global MDA Journal Journal