What is the best water?
Viktor Schauberger (long heralded as the Water Wizard) was critical of modern science for many reasons. At the foundation of his unrest was what he referred to as our mechanistic approach to life. It’s true. Modern science and philosophy attempt to describe natural processes using a linear approach—a series of events—as though life itself were a machine.
Nature is not a giant machine churning out the same result over and over again. In fact, because Nature works in cycles, the end result is never the same (see Chapter 2 of Dancing with Water). With each creative cycle, Nature infuses upgraded energy, and as long as circumstances are favorable, life evolves in an orderly fashion. Life is a symphony composed and played in the same moment—impossible to mechanize no matter how sophisticated the technology.
While science has been able to simulate many of Nature’s processes with machines, closer inspection reveals that most of these attempts miss the mark. In order to understand life as a step-by step progression of events, scientists study small portions at a time. Each event is broken into tiny parts. In this way, whole fields of study may develop around a part of a larger process and scientists can spend an entire lifetime with no comprehension of the big picture.
What they end up with are the equivalent of two-dimensional pieces to a multi-dimensional puzzle—and no way to put the pieces together. Consequently, an organism is never viewed as a whole—nor can it be viewed as a part of the even bigger “Web of Life.”
Natural Water Technology
versus Machines
91