MARKETING AFRICA ISSUE 12/16 | Page 5

What we have been witnessing in the region is unfortunate and counterproductive. Unhealthy internal competition has seen the unnecessary escalation of prices on mega projects which we can assume is tied to rent seeking activities. Lack of cooperation in mega infrastructural projects will not only raise the overall cost of the projects but it will also mean we shall end up with non integrated systems as each neighbour goes it alone to grandstand the other. We shall lose the advantage of negotiating as a region and having an overall strategy that works in the best interests of the people of the wider East African region. It will also have a long term effect of making the region uncompetitive. Saddled with expensive foreign loans and grants and having multiple suppliers with conflicting and competing systems will in due course make East Africa a high cost production area quite contrary to what the aims of the integration are. and this on paper worked perfectly well. We did see an upsurge in tax collection and for a while back then we seemed to have hit on the correct formula for economic take off. But another indicator of poverty is endemic corruption and it kicked in to subvert the now well oiled tax collection system. The collecting agency is now in a panic due to unmet targets and has started to get creative on ways to boost collection. Another indicator of poverty is low tax compliance which in most cases is occasioned by high taxes thereby creating a real incentive to evade and avoid taxes. Kenya has punitively high tax rates and as expected tax cheating aided by tax personnel is rampant. There is always a fine balance between what one would call fair taxation and a level where paying any more taxes becomes a disincentive. The current narrow tax base puts undue pressure on those the taxman has captured in the system. When Kenya embarked on ambitious tax reforms it was in response to dwindling foreign aid support which came with political conditions. It was correctly determined that we shall in future reduce our foreign aid component in our national budget. In an effort to bridge the tax collection gap, the taxman collates far too much detail on too few people and inadvertently creates the perfect conditions for corruption. In Kenya the difference between the legal tax avoidance and the illegal tax evasion is too thin. The bye word adopted was that “Kulipa Ushuru Ni Kujitegemea” One unanticipated consequence of our robust tax system is that our ‘‘Being the leader in a race of lame ducks hardly gives one the rights to crow and sadly the other countries in the region seem more intent on taking over the crowing rights rather than cooperating to raise the economic wellbeing of the region.’’ ‘‘What will very likely bring us to our knees in the region will be the non harmonised tax regimes. If the region does not endeavour to create a unified tax regime, and this looks unlikely currently, then we shall end up with a recipe for disaster as integration will be virtually impossible.’ regional partners are still in the foreign assistance mode for bridging their budgetary shortfalls and have therefore not really bothered to domestically support the running of the government. What will very likely bring us to our knees in the region will be the non harmonised tax regimes. If the region does not endeavour to create a unified tax regime, and this looks unlikely currently, then we shall end up with a recipe for disaster as integration will be virtually impossible. Non harmonised tax regimes create far too many loop holes for tax evasion, escalate tax collection costs and encourage corruption. Kenya’s go it alone style in tax management and failure to rope in the bloc partners may eventually be what breaks the regional camel’s back. Let us hope that our new slogan does not become “Kulipa Ushuru Ni Kulemewa’, dubious bragging rights notwithstanding!!!