MAL 19/17 (MARKETING AFRICA) | Page 56

However, the fruits were still there on display and the price (in cowrie shells) was indicated. A buyer simply dropped the required number of cowrie shells and took what they needed and proceeded with their journey. Now, that was an honest society and that represented the African society of the past. The value placed on family names and family honor was so great that no one wanted to mess with it. Where then did the curse come from? At what point did the African lose all sense of morality and integrity? One theory puts it at the point where they were taught to profit from causing losses for their own. The practice of slave trade existed in Africa and indeed in other parts of the world for thousands of years. Tribal wars led to the conquered being carted off as slaves who were then used as military, farm and later domestic workers for the conquerors. In Biblical times, Joseph was sold by his brothers to wealthy Arab merchants (The Ishmaelites) who then sold him to the Pharaoh’s chief of staff called Potiphar. It can be argued that the Arab merchants’ pioneered the organized trade of humans in Africa – a trade that was then taken to the next level by the Europeans when they arrived on the scene. So lucrative was the Trans Saharan Slave Trade that Martin Meredith reports in the book The Fortunes of Africa, ‘The majority were female slaves who were bought by prosperous urban households for use as servants and concubines. The average ‘service life’ of a slave – the time between final purchase and manumission or death – was no more than about seven years, so the need for replacements kept demand high. In exchange, the Kanemis purchased horses and weapons with 54 MAL 19/17 ISSUE ‘‘ : Then the era of independence came but was the independence true? Political independence alone is not enough to take a people forward. Political independence without economic independence is a farce but then economic independence is not attainable without mental independence.’’ which to continue their raids. A good horse could cost between ten and thirty slaves.’ [1] So can the African Leadership curse be attributed to the fact that more than in any other part of the world, Africans understood bondage and have never been able to fully break out of it? Could this be why a person can be a thief but if he can steal enough money to become wealthy, his people will celebrate him as a leader and it will then become dangerous to bring such a person to justice without invoking the wrath of his tribe? Did the slave mentality linger to such depths? Stealing is only bad when it has not attained the threshold of wealth. Once it attains that threshold, people naturally submit to the thief as their leader and they as slaves to the wishes of the thief turned leader. Is the curse a direct consequence of slave trade? ‘‘Some have blamed colonialists for the curse. Do they have a point? ‘‘Years ago when Kwame Nkrumah began his crusade for a powerful African Super State, he was chided and derided. In fact, on September 5 1961 A. W. Snelling, British High Commissioner to Ghana sent a despatch to the Commonwealth Relations Office in London which read: “To us, it is particularly galling to have this egoist Nkrumah shouting us to take off the brakes in the Rhodesias, Nyasaland and Kenya and drive faster down the road of independence, which we know much better than he does. And his knack for giving expression to the feelings of so many Africans, who are all the time becoming more politically conscious, is exasperating. I can well understand the fury he arouses in London, and often share it myself … He wants to kick us out of Africa. He opposes us over the common market and has the impertinence to start talking about a commonwealth without Britain.vMuch the best course would be for us to kick him out of the Commonwealth. We shall be better off without him”[1]. (New Africa Magazine December 2005) Lord Lugard the one time Governor General of Nigeria is quoted to have said, ‘My African friends often say to me when we are discussing the past acts of Britain, I always tell them: “yes, but it was all done in the interest of Britain not of Africa’[2] A clear cut example of this is in what is a confession of a conspiracy as told by a British insider as highlighted here-under: When Sir James Robertson (another Governor General of Nigeria) was coming to Nigeria, he came with a mandate. The mandate was to enthrone a Northerner as the Prime Minister; to ruin the Southern Educated Elite under leadership of Chief Awolowo. For this purpose some British graduates were recruited in England to come and serve on the headquarters in